My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0303
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0303
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2014 2:27:11 PM
Creation date
3/27/2014 2:25:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/3/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, March 3,2014 <br /> Page 28 <br /> 16. Councilmember-Initiated Items for Future Meetings <br /> Councilmember Laliberte asked for an update on the litigation and appeal recently dis- <br /> missed by the appellate court; and questioned whether that information had sufficiently <br /> filtered back to the community given the amount of public discussion the issue had re- <br /> ceived. <br /> City Attorney Mark Gaughan provided a brief review, noting that some matters had come <br /> before the City Council in November of 2013 related to the transfer and renewal of a liq- <br /> uor license, with the City Council ultimately approving both for the applicant, Total <br /> Wine. Mr. Gaughan noted that the decision had subsequently resulted in other interested <br /> parties bringing legal action seeking a review by the Court of Appeals of that City Coun- <br /> cil decision; with the appellate court dismissing that legal action based on a determination <br /> that they had no legal standing to request such a review. Mr. Gaughan advised that the <br /> party now had thirty days from that judge's decision to submit their appeal to the Minne- <br /> sota Supreme Court for review. Mr. Gaughan advised that, to-date, his calendar indicated <br /> nothing had been filed at this point. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Mayor Roe advised that future discussions <br /> of water and sewer lines and responsibilities would be part of a broader policy discussion <br /> for base rates. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon concurred, advising that he needed to check with staff to determine when <br /> they could have the information and a report ready for the City Council. <br /> For the record, Mayor Roe opined that it was fair to state that Roseville was not unique in <br /> its approach for City versus resident water line ownership in the State or Country; and <br /> noted the number of communities dealing with similar issues. Mayor Roe noted that the <br /> City Council and its staff was trying to assist people as much as possible to find resolu- <br /> tion to problems created over these unusual winter months and long-term low tempera- <br /> tures. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.