Laserfiche WebLink
<br />V. Development Alternatives <br /> <br />Based on the Main Street Concept Alternative selected by the Task Force, six development <br />alternatives were explored that looked at further refinement and arrangement of the City Center <br />uses. The five alternatives and based on several work sessions with the City Center Task Force. <br />A study model was prepared with appropriately scaled building blocks. The Task Force was able <br />to move the building blocks around to study the two and three.dimensional relationships between <br />uses. Fonn these work sessions the options were recorded and illustrative development plans <br />were prepared for further discussion and refinement. <br /> <br />In each option described below the new north/south road and city square are recognized as fixed <br />elements of the plan. In addition to the primary uses, government center, recreation center and <br />community center, several options look at providing new multi-family housing as part of the <br />program. <br /> <br />The Task Force also recognized that the Recreation Center should be physically attached to the <br />existing recreational facilities, Ice Arena and John Rose Oval. It also recognized that the indoor <br />pool had the ability to act as a gateway and "sign post" from County Road C into the City Center. <br />As a result each option locates the Indoor Pool along County Road C and the Recreation Center <br />attached and linked to the Ice Arena. <br /> <br />The Task Force also recognized that the existing City Hall building had value and that while its <br />use might change the building should be retained in all options. <br /> <br />As in the development of the initial concept, the development options assume that the public <br />works garage is relocated off-site and that the fire station and license bureau is relocated either <br />on~site or off-site. One option looks specifically at a new public safety building as a primary <br />component ofthe City Center. <br /> <br />Underground parking was ruled out as too expensive and thus each option addresses above <br />ground parking. Due to the parking demand for the existing and new uses on the site, it is <br />assumed parking will be handles in both surface and structured parking. The Task Force is very <br />concerned that surface parking not overwhelm the character and quality of the City Center <br />environment. <br /> <br />Development Option A <br /> <br />Option A (Illustration H) contemplates constructing a new City Hall building on the north side of <br />city square and a front door on the north/south road. A new Community Center occupies the <br />existing City Hall building (20,000 SF). The existing building is expanded to the east (20,000 <br />SF) for a total of 40,000 SF on two levels. <br /> <br />Parking to support the City Center is located on the west side of the City Square and along <br />Lexington Avenue. A "wintergarden" space provides a year round enclosed open space as well <br />as a link between the community center and the parking structure. 150 spaces per level can be <br />accommodated in the parking structure. Approximately 4 - 5 levels would be needed to provide <br />600 -700 parking spaces. The ground floor of the parking structure, along the City Square edge <br />would have supporting service commercial uses. Additional parking is provided in a new one <br />level ramp over the existing Ice Arena parking lot and surface parking to the north of the Ice <br />Arena. <br /> <br />Roseville City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy <br /> <br />]4 <br /> <br />Draft! 1.10.99 <br />