My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03277
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3200
>
pf_03277
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:41:39 AM
Creation date
11/30/2004 6:08:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3277A
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Address
2330 LEXINGTON AVE N
Applicant
MCKINLEY COMPANIES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />2 <br /> <br />Brenda Himrich, 1082 Lovell Ave., noted the east side would be the front yard of her <br />home. What type of lighting would be placed on the rear of the building? (downcast). <br />She asked for details on the fence. (There is a State highway chain link fence on the south <br />side. A fence on the east side would be up to 6 \12 feet in height, board-on-board wood <br />fence.) She preferred having a fence and landscaping. She asked for details of the <br />pathway along Lexington A venue. Deb Bloom explained the pathway plan and <br />requirements of the developer to contribute to the fund. <br /> <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />II <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br /> <br />Brenda Himrich noted there is an open well on the site that should be capped (Staff and <br />developer will review). Could the pine tree be saved? <br /> <br />Stew Thomley, neighbor adjacent to the proposal, expressed concern about through <br />traffic from the business. Such through-traffic speeds excessively. It is now posted as <br />private property with no through-traffic. The Day Care traffic is a problem (safety, <br />speed, wear/tear on roads). <br /> <br />Chair Klausing noted that customers to the business are more likely not to be there daily <br />and would use Lexington A venue. Mr. Thomley said employees would learn the <br />"shortcuts". Chair Klausing asked what condition should be placed on the development <br />(Staff will review the site plan and entry designs). <br /> <br />')'"' <br />--' <br /> <br />The architect and owner explained curb channelization to reduce through traffic. The <br />fence should match existing fence, and, should extend to the northeast comer to reduce <br />hazards. <br /> <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br /> <br />Member Wilke asked if the townhome access could be closed access to Lexington <br />A venue. Thomas Paschke explained the history of the road. <br />Chair Klausing asked if there was reason for curb cuts. Deb Bloom explained how the <br />parking lot could be designed with entry access encouraging use of Lexington A venue. <br /> <br />32 <br /> <br />There were no further comments. Chair Klausing closed the hearing. <br /> <br />33 <br /> <br />34 <br /> <br />Chair Klausing said the change to the Comprehensive Plan was a good change; it is a <br />good use and would be a good neighbor. The City still retains the same balance of <br />residential to commercial. <br /> <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br /> <br />Motion: By resolution, Member Klausing moved, second by Member Cunningham, to <br />recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendment to change <br />the designation for the .56-acre parcel from High Density Residential (HR) to Business <br />(B). <br /> <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br /> <br />Ayes: 5 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />Motion: Member Klausing moved, seconded by Member Wilke, to recommend approval <br />of the rezoning from Single Family Residential District (R-I) to Business-Planned Unit <br />Development (B-PUD) with an underlying (base) zoning of Limited Business District <br />(B-1). <br /> <br />Ayes: 5 <br />Nays: 0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.