Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />II <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br /> <br />Extract of Minutes from Plannin2 Commission meetin2 of Januarv 10.2001: <br /> <br />b. Plannin2 File 3277: A request by the McKinley Companies for a <br />Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amendment, Rezoning and a Planned Unit <br />Development "General Concept Plan" for the redevelopment of property at 2330 <br />Lexington A venue for use as a five-unit office condominium. The proposal <br />would require rezoning from R-l Single Family to Planned Unit Development <br />with a base zoning of B-1, Limited Business District and a Comprehensive Land <br />Use Plan Amendment from High Density Residential (HDR) to Business (B). <br /> <br />Chairman Craig Klausing opened the public hearing and requested City Planner Thomas <br />Paschke to provide a verbal summary of the staff report dated January 10, 2001. <br /> <br />Thomas Paschke explained the proposed five-unit office condominiums, with 12,288 s.f. <br />of total space. The office will face west with parking also on the west side. The building <br />will be vinyl siding, asphalt roofs, trees will be preserved. New coniferous trees will be <br />planted on the east side. The staff received a letter (January 9, 200 I) from Steve Pfeiffer <br />who expressed concern with the traffic (attached). Thomas Paschke noted the staff <br />recommended approval. <br /> <br />Chair Klausing asked for an explanation of the parking and proof of parking. Thomas <br />Paschke explained that there are additional spaces that could be added if needed. Thomas <br />Paschke noted that this type ofrestricted small office development would not generate <br />high traffic. <br /> <br />Member Rhody asked about the impact of the five-foot south setback from the Highway <br />36 right-of-way (no apparent impact). <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />Member Wilke asked about the ownership of the private driveway known as Lovell <br />Drive. There are no private easements recorded with the City. <br /> <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br /> <br />Thomas Paschke explained the past history of development on this site. <br /> <br />Deb Bloom explained that the access to Lexington crosses this property and the Day Care <br />property. <br /> <br />36 <br /> <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br /> <br />Brent Thompson, applicant, explained needs for proof of parking on Hamline A venue, <br />and on Rice Street in Vadnais Heights. A typical floor plan will have three offices, with <br />a need for five to seven parking spaces, primarily for attorneys, accountants and other <br />low impact professionals (There are 35 parking spaces on the site). <br /> <br />Member Cunningham asked for details of rear side of the building in order to create <br />walkout units (There is a ten-foot drop in some areas). Member Cunningham asked for <br />details of parking to the east of the project by townhome owners. <br /> <br />Steve Thornley, President of the Townhome Association, asked for details of preserving <br />the trees along the southeast corner of the property (pine trees). Mr. Thompson will <br />review the trees on site. <br /> <br />Bob Zakaris, 1060 Lovell, asked if the outfall from the detention pond is connected to the <br />City storm sewer (yes). <br />