Laserfiche WebLink
HRA Meeting <br />Minutes – Tuesday, February 18, 2014 <br />Page 7 <br />1 <br />Mr. Munson displayed some “before” and “after” pictures of property maintenance issues <br />2 <br />addressed, and removal of outside storage violations, proving that a small investment greatly <br />3 <br />improved property conditions and appearances citywide for the benefit of everyone. <br />4 <br />5 <br />Mr. Munson reviewed the process used in notifying property owners of the upcoming <br />6 <br />inspections, asking them to walk through their property before the City’s inspection, and the <br />7 <br />very good cooperation found by staff from the business community. Mr. Munson noted that <br />8 <br />staff made every effort not to alienate the businesses community; and noted that some needed <br />9 <br />to delay some work to work it into their next year’s budget cycle. However, Mr. Munson <br />10 <br />advised that no abatements had been issued to-date; and overall the business owners expressed <br />11 <br />their support in the program. <br />12 <br />13 <br />Mr. Munson reviewed some of the comments made by property owners, and the reassurance <br />14 <br />expressed by the business community in the City taking pride in the community; with some <br />15 <br />receiving needed impetus by the City to direct to their corporate and/or out-of-state decision- <br />16 <br />makers to address local concerns. Mr. Munson advised that business property owners seemed <br />17 <br />receptive to the City continuing inspections, as long as all properties were held to the same <br />18 <br />standard. <br />19 <br />20 <br />Mr. Munson noted one problem found in the process was that sometimes the property <br />21 <br />maintenance person had not seen the introductory letter and repair notice, creating an <br />22 <br />unwelcome surprise from his supervisor, and causing a very few to therefore not be supportive <br />23 <br />of the inspection program. <br />24 <br />25 <br />In the future, Mr. Munson reviewed the plan for the three-year inspection cycles, with <br />26 <br />residential areas inspected in years 1 and 2, and commercial areas inspected in year 3, and then <br />27 <br />repeating the cycle. Mr. Munson opined that any faster schedule would be less well-received <br />28 <br />and in his opinion, less productive. <br />29 <br />30 <br />Member Masche thanked staff for their efforts, opining that they had added value to the <br />31 <br />community from those efforts. <br />32 <br />33 <br />Mr. Munson again recognized the excellent code enforcement staff, and their expertise and <br />34 <br />communication skills throughout the process in working with residents and business owners. <br />35 <br />36 <br />Ms. Kelsey noted that Mr. England had previously worked for the City as a temporary, <br />37 <br />seasonal employee, but would now be working full-time implementing the City’s rental <br />38 <br />licensing inspection program for the City, along with Jan Rosemeyer, in between his other <br />39 <br />duties with the NEP. <br />40 <br />41 <br />7. Public Hearings <br />42 <br />None. <br />43 <br />44 <br />Presentations <br />8. <br />45 <br />(See above) <br />46 <br />47 <br />9. Action/Discussion Items <br />48 <br />49 <br />a.Sherman Associates Resolution of Support for HOME Application <br />50 <br />Ms. Kelsey reviewed the request, as detailed in the staff report dated February 18, 2014; and <br />51 <br />advised that representatives of Sherman Associates had a scheduling conflict and were unable <br />52 <br />to attend tonight’s meeting. Ms. Kelsey reviewed the status and success or lack thereof of <br />53 <br />previous grant applications, and past support by the HRA and City Council for those efforts. <br />54 <br /> <br />