My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-02-18_HRA_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Housing Redevelopment Authority
>
Minutes
>
2014
>
2014-02-18_HRA_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2014 1:55:39 PM
Creation date
4/16/2014 1:55:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/18/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HRA Meeting <br />Minutes – Tuesday, February 18, 2014 <br />Page 6 <br />1 <br />Member Etten noted that, while everyone loved green space, realistically people still drove <br />2 <br />vehicles and needed parking space. <br />3 <br />4 <br />For the benefit of the public, Ms. Kelsey reiterated the neighborhood meeting scheduled <br />5 <br />Thursday, February 20, 2014, at the King of Kings Lutheran Church. Ms. Kelsey asked <br />6 <br />neighbors to alert others to the meeting, noting that notices had been sent to all those <br />7 <br />previously notices during the CDI process, as well as those that would be included in the <br />8 <br />notice requirement area for any rezoning consideration. Ms. Kelsey advised that there will be <br />9 <br />public hearing before the Planning Commission: a text amendment to the City’s Zoning <br />10 <br />Ordinance to address reduced setbacks for pocket neighborhoods; and amendment to the City’s <br />11 <br />Comprehensive Plan; and other items before the Commission and the City Council. Ms. <br />12 <br />Kelsey advised that those issues were tentatively scheduled for the Planning Commission’s <br />13 <br />March 2014 meeting. Ms. Kelsey noted that this would be another opportunity for public <br />14 <br />comment. <br />15 <br />16 <br />c. Code Enforcement/BEP Update for 2013 – Roseville Codes Coordinator Don Munson <br />17 <br />Codes Coordinator Don Munson introduced Code Compliance Assistant David England; <br />18 <br />noting that David and Jan Rosemeyer from their department were largely responsible for the <br />19 <br />success of the Neighborhood Enhancement Program, and the most recent commercial and <br />20 <br />multi-family residential code compliance programs. <br />21 <br />22 <br />Mr. Munson reviewed the 2013 enhancement program, focusing on the Business Property <br />23 <br />Enhancement Program (BPEP) for commercial and multi-family residential properties, and <br />24 <br />reviewed the background and purpose of the programs to inspect public areas, notify property <br />25 <br />owners of nuisance conditions, and follow-up for correction of those violations. <br />26 <br />27 <br />Mr. Munson reviewed the specifics of the BPEP to maintain the appeal citywide of those <br />28 <br />properties, and displayed a map of 2013 inspection areas and the five areas spread throughout <br />29 <br />the community, with 537 individual properties inspected, including public buildings. Mr. <br />30 <br />Munson noted that the most common issues found were: painting, graffiti, outside storage <br />31 <br />issues; junk, debris, brush, and dilapidated conditions (property maintenance) and long grass. <br />32 <br />Mr. Munson noted that other less prolific issues included inoperable vehicles and equipment. <br />33 <br />34 <br />Of those 537 inspections, Mr. Munson noted that the final recap indicated a finding of 62% or <br />35 <br />335 of those properties having had violations for a total of 978 violations (average of three per <br />36 <br />property), which had been considerably higher than the residential program and violations <br />37 <br />found. Mr. Munson opined that those findings indicated the need for such an inspection <br />38 <br />program as the City continues to age. Of those cases and types of nuisances found, Mr. <br />39 <br />Munson advised that the highest number of violations involved outside storage, property <br />40 <br />maintenance, and paint issues. <br />41 <br />42 <br />Mr. Munson displayed a map showing a breakdown of violation areas, and noted that 202 <br />43 <br />properties had no nuisance conditions at all; with 353 having violations, some involving 1 to 4 <br />44 <br />violations, and some even having 5 or more nuisance conditions, with 40 properties identified <br />45 <br />with five or more violations. Of the total of 978 violations citywide, Mr. Munson advised that <br />46 <br />806 of those violations had already been voluntarily corrects, a statistic that he found very <br />47 <br />encouraging. Mr. Munson stated several times that staff had been very encouraged by the very <br />48 <br />good response before, during and after the inspections from the business community. Of the <br />49 <br />remaining 172 violations, Mr. Munson advised that most remained incomplete due to weather- <br />50 <br />related issues; but that staff would follow-up on them when summer arrived. Mr. Munson <br />51 <br />further noted that the compliance rate to correct the violations for all types of violations was <br />52 <br />pretty well addressed, with not one particular type of business in the community resisting <br />53 <br />making corrections. <br />54 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.