My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014_0421_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2014
>
2014_0421_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2014 1:43:38 PM
Creation date
4/17/2014 2:45:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 n pertinent requirements. The applicant is continuing to wark with Public Works staff on <br />5� these details. <br />5� 52 Since the Planning Commission is responsible for holding the public hearings for <br />5��' applications like the proposed vacation, Planning Division staff is preparing the report <br />5u� and supporting materials for review. But the Planning staff doesn't have an interest, per <br />5�; se, in such proposals and merely conveys the comments and recommendation of the <br />6�.� Public Warks Department in addition to coordinating the review of the proposal by the <br />s^ Planning Commission and City Council. <br />6� 6.0 PRELIMINARY PLAT ANALYSIS <br />�a 6.1 Plat proposals are reviewed primarily for the purpose of ensuring that all proposed lots <br />6« meet the minimum size requirements of the zoning code, that adequate streets and other <br />6� public infrastructure are in place or identified and constructed, and that storm water is <br />6n addressed to prevent problems either on nearby property or within the storm water <br />6' <br />6� 62 <br />69 <br />7:� <br />7" 63 <br />7r <br />73 <br />74 <br />�5 <br />�� <br />�� <br />7 �� <br />�v; <br />8a � <br />8� <br />system. <br />As noted above, the proposed p�LlMnvaRY pLaT meets the requirements for drainage <br />and utility easements and exceeds the minimum lot size requirements. The proposed <br />p�LlMnv�Y pLAT is included with this report as Attachment D. <br />Roseville's Public Warks Department staff has been warking with the applicant to <br />address the requirements related to grading, drainage, easements, and dedication of <br />additional right-of-way along both County Road B and Farrington Street. While these <br />details are essential parts of a pxELlMrIV�Y pLAT application, the City Council is not <br />asked to review and digest such engineering-related plans; instead, actions by the City <br />Council typically include conditions that such plans must ultimately meet the approval of <br />Public Warks staf£ To that end, Engineering staff has reviewed the subject plan and has <br />returned some comments to the applicant related to general site grading as it relates to <br />storm water as well as some general utility items; these items will be addressed to satisfy <br />administrative requirements for issuance of any grading and/or building permits. Beyond <br />these items, Engineering staff has no remaining comments on the preliminary plat <br />82 6.4 City Code § 1011.04 (Tree Preservation) specif'ies that an approved tree preservation plan <br />8.� is a necessary prerequisite for approval of a pxEL1�NAxY pLAT. A tree survey has been <br />s� provided which identifies the trees on the property as well as the trees which are likely to <br />a:,-�� be removed, based on the current grading and utility plans and anticipated locations <br />a� houses and driveways. Largely because about 80% of trees to be removed are not <br />s�� characterized as "significant" trees according to § 1011.04, the result of the tree <br />8r replacement calculation is that no replacement trees are required. While the essential <br />8� information has been provided, the final tree preservation plan depends upon the final <br />gC; grading plan and plans for the individual homes, which may not be finalized until after <br />g� the final plat; for this reason, it is prudent to proceed with review and possible approval <br />g� of the p�LllvmvARY pLAT with the condition that site grading and building permits should <br />9'; <br />9` <br />9� 6.5 <br />not be issued without iterative review of the tree preservation plan to account for any <br />impacts not anticipated at this point in the planning process. <br />At its meeting of February 6, 2014 Roseville's Parks and Recreation Commission <br />g� reviewed the proposed p�LIMrIVAxY pLAT against the park dedication requirements of <br />g�� § 1103.07 of the City Code and recommended a dedication of cash in lieu of land. The <br />�� existing land area is composed of two buildable parcels subdivided from Lot 7 of the <br />PF14-002 Prelim RCA_042ll4 (2).doc <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.