2014_0421_CCpacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

9g 1881 Michel's Rearrangement of Lots 9 to 16 Inclusive of Mackubin and Iglehart's � oo Addition of Out Lots plat. Since the existing land comprises two residential units, the �o� proposed 7-unit plat would create five new building sites. The 2014 Fee Schedule � 02 establishes a park dedication amount of $3,500 per residential unit; for the five, newly- �os created residential lots the total park dedication would be $17,500, to be collected prior � 04 to recording an approved plat at Ramsey County. 105 7.0 PUBLIC COMMENT � 06 7.1 The duly-noticed public hearing for this application was held by the Planning � 07 Commission at its meeting of April 10, 2014; draft minutes of the meeting are included � og with this RCA as Attachment E. No concerns were expressed about the number or size of �os the proposed lots, but some people were nervous about the fact that duplexes and other � � o two-family structures are permitted in the LDR-2 district. In the end, the maj ority of � � � Planning Commissioners were comfortable that one-family detached homes will be � � 2 developed as proposed and voted, 6— l, to recommend approval of the application. � � 3 72 In addition to the comments offered at the public hearing, Planning Division staff has � � 4 received one email from a neighboring property owner about the proposal. This � � 5 homeowner has no particular problem with the proposed one-family development, but is � � 6 concerned about ensuring that the storm water issues on his property are not exacerbated � � 7 by the development. The email is included with this RCA as Attachment F. 118 8.0 RECOMMENDATION � � 9 8.1 Based on the comments and findings outlined in Sections 3— 4 and 7 of this report, the � 2o Planning Division concurs with the recommendation of the Planning Commission to �2� approve the proposed REZONnvG of the property at 297-311 County Road B from LDR-1 �22 to LDR-2, pursuant to Title 10 of the Roseville Ciry Code, with the condition that the �23 rezoning shall be contingent upon approval and recording of the final plat. �24 82 Based on the comments and findings outlined in Sections 3, 5, and 7 of this report, the �25 Planning Division and Public Warks Department concur with the recommendation of the �26 Planning Commission to approve the proposed EASEMENT vACAT1oN at 311 County Road � 27 B, with the condition that the final approval of the easement vacation shall be contingent �28 upon approval and recording of the final plat. �2g 83 Based on the comments and findings outlined in Sections 3, 5, and 7 of this report, the � 3o Planning Division concurs with the recommendation of the Planning Commission to � 3 � approve the proposed P�LIMnv�Y PLAT pursuant to Title 11 of the Roseville City Code � 32 with the condition that permits for site improvements shall not be issued without iterative ��3 review of the tree preservation plan to account for any impacts not previously anticipated. PF14-002 Prelim RCA_042ll4 (2).doc Page 4 of 5