My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014_0421_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2014
>
2014_0421_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2014 1:43:38 PM
Creation date
4/17/2014 2:45:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3.0 BACKGROUND <br />g 3.1 The subject property, located in Planning District 16, has a Comprehensive Plan Land <br />� o Use Designation of Low-Density Residential (LR) and a zoning classif'ication of Low- <br />� � Density Residential-2 (LDR-2) District. <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />32 When exercising the so-called "quasi judicial" authority when acting on a pLAT request, <br />the role of the City is to determine the facts associated with a particular request and apply <br />those facts to the legal standards contained in the ordinance and relevant state law. In <br />general, if the facts indicate the applicant meets the relevant legal standard, then they are <br />likely entitled to the approval, although the City is able to add conditions to a plat <br />approval to ensure that the likely impacts to roads, storm sewers, and other public <br />infrastructure on and around the subject property are adequately addressed. <br />33 City Council review and action pertaining to the Moore's Farrington Estates <br />p�LlMnv�Y pLAT was to occur as a preceding agenda item during the same City <br />Council meeting as the requested review and action for the Fnv�, pLAT. This is a more <br />condensed timeline than most plats for a couple of reasons: first, the plat itself is simple, <br />requiring no new streets, major utilities, or public improvement contracts; and second, <br />the applicant needs to take possession of the property in time to allow the Roseville Fire <br />Department to utilize the buildings on the subject property for training exercises on a <br />selected date in the middle of May 2014. While actions on final plats typically follow <br />approvals of their respective preliminary plats by a number of weeks, the time between <br />such actions is not regulated by State Statute or City Code. Instead, the time following <br />approval of a preliminary plat is typically used by the applicant to refine the plat, <br />grading, utility, and other details as required by the preliminary plat approvaL Those final <br />details and documents have already been prepared by the present applicant and reviewed <br />by City staff; if the PRELIMnv�Y PLAT is approved consistent with the recommendation <br />of the Planning Commission, City staff has determined that the Frlv�, pLAT application <br />may also be approved as presented. <br />35 4.0 <br />36 4.1 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />FINAL PLAT ANALYSIS <br />Plat proposals are reviewed primarily for the purpose of ensuring that all proposed lots <br />meet the minimum size requirements of the zoning code, that adequate streets and other <br />public infrastructure are in place or identified and constructed, and that storm water is <br />addressed to prevent problems either on nearby property or within the storm water <br />40 system. <br />4� 42 The proposed FnvALpLAT meets the requirements for drainage and utility easements and <br />42 exceeds the minimum lot size requirements in the LDR-2 district. The proposed FnvAL <br />4s pLAT is included with this report as Attachment C. <br />4q� 43 Roseville's Public Warks Department staff has been warking with the applicant to <br />45 address the requirements related to grading, drainage, easements, and dedication of <br />46 additional right-of-way along both County Road B and Farrington Street. While these <br />4� details are essential parts of a pLAT application, the City Council is not asked to review <br />4$ and digest such engineering-related plans; instead, actions by the City Council typically <br />4g include conditions that such plans must ultimately meet the approval of Public Warks <br />5o staf£ To that end, Engineering staff has reviewed the subject plan and has returned some <br />5� comments to the applicant related to general site grading as it relates to storm water as <br />52� well as some general utility items; these items will be addressed to satisfy administrative <br />PF14-002 Final RCA 042114.doc <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.