2014_0421_CCpacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

5`5 requirements for issuance of any grading and/or building permits. Beyond these items, 5�T Engineering staff has no remaining comments on the plat 5�� 4.4 City Code § 1011.04 (Tree Preservation) specif'ies that a, approved tree preservation plan 5� is a necessary prerequisite for approval of a pLAT. A tree survey has been provided which 5 r identifies the trees on the property as well as the trees which are likely to be removed, 5r based on the current grading and utility plans and anticipated locations houses and 5� driveways. Largely because about 80% of trees to be removed are not characterized as so "significant" trees according to § 1011.04, the result of a current tree replacement 6� calculation is that no replacement trees are required. While the essential infarmation has 6� been provided, the ultimate tree replacement requirements depend upon the final grading 63 plan and plans for the individual homes, which may not be finalized until after the final 6� plat; for this reason, it is prudent to proceed with review and possible approval of the 6;� Fnv�, pLAT with the condition that site grading and building permits should not be issued 6p without iterative review of the tree preservation plan to account for any impacts to trees e�,� not anticipated at this point in the planning process. 6s 4.5 At its meeting of February 6, 2014 Roseville's Parks and Recreation Commission 6� reviewed the proposed p�LIMnvAxY pLAT against the park dedication requirements of 70 § 1103.07 of the City Code and recommended a dedication of cash in lieu of land. The �� existing land area is composed of two buildable parcels subdivided from Lot 7 of the 7� 1881 Michel's Rearrangement of Lots 9 to 16lnclusive of Mackubin and Iglehart's 7� Addition of Out Lots to St. Paul plat. Since the existing land comprises two residential 7� units, the proposed 7-unit plat would create five new building sites. The 2014 Fee 7� Schedule establishes a park dedication amount of $3,500 per residential unit; for the five, �6 newly-created residential lots the total park dedication would be $17,500, to be collected 7� prior to recording an approved plat at Ramsey County. 78 5.0 RECOMMENDATION 7� Based on the comments and findings outlined in Sections 3— 5 of this report, the s:�� Planning Division recommends approval of the proposed Fnv�, pLAT, pursuant to Title 11 s� of the Roseville City Code and subject to any changes required for approval of the 8� preliminary plat, with the condition that permits for site improvements shall not be issued ga without iterative review of the tree preservation plan to account for any impacts to trees s�T not previously anticipated. 8;� 6.0 POSSIBLE COUNCIL ACTIONS s� 6.1 Adopt a resolution approving the proposed the proposed Moore's Farrington 87 Estates FIlVAL PLA'r, as recommended, for the property at 297-311 County Road B, s� pursuant to Title 11 of the City Code and the recommendation of Sections 5 of this s�; report. g+�� 62 Pass a motion to table the item for future action. Tabling beyond June 20, 2013 may g� require extension of the 60-day action deadline established in Minn. Stat. § 15.99. g�' 63 Pass a motion, to deny the requested approval. Denial should be supported by specific g� findings of fact based on the City Council's review of the application, applicable zoning g n or subdivision regulations, and the public record. Prepared by: Senior Planner Bryan Lloyd 651-792-7073 � bryan.11oyd@ci.roseville.mn.us PF14-002 Final RCA 042ll4.doc Page 3 of 4