pf_02188 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

B-Dale Amoco, Case No. 2188 Page 2 As previously noted, the sketch that has been submitted is not scaled, so it is impossible to give a specific answer to this question. The areas of outdoor display are limited to the two areas between the pump islands and the section of sidewalk to the left of the entrance door. b. The location of the outdoor display and the extent to which it encroaches on required setbacks. The display areas shown on the sketch do not encroach on any required yard areas. c. The impact on traffic and pedestrian circulation on the site. The proposed locations would not have any adverse effect on traffic circulation. Because of the 5-foot height of the displays between the pump islands, the Engineering Department has raised a concern for pedestrian safety. This is a question that should be reviewed in greater detail and one which the applicant should respond to. d. The height of the proposed displays. If we are reading the sketch correctly, the tire racks between the pump islands would be 5 feet high and the tire rack in front of the building would be limited to 3 feet high. e. The hours in which the merchandise will be displayed. No information was provided related to hours of display. f. The nature of merchandise to be displayed. The sketch shows only tires and motor oil to be displayed. 3. CONCLUSION More specific information is needed to evaluate the specific percentage of outdoor display versus interior display. We will notify the applicant about the concern regarding pedestrian safety and the proposed height of displays, and we will visit the site to evaluate this issue. The planning Commission members should try to visit the site and judge this question for yourselves. We will also contact the applicant and request information related to the hours of display.