My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02231
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2200
>
pf_02231
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:45:40 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 10:54:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2231
Planning Files - Type
Special Use Permit
Address
2931 PARTRIDGE RD
Applicant
POPE ASSOCIATES, INC.
PIN
052923130005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING REPORT <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />10 April 1991 <br /> <br />CASE NUMBER: <br /> <br />2231 <br /> <br />APPLICANT: <br /> <br />Pope Associates, Inc. <br /> <br />LOCATION: <br /> <br />2931 Partridge Road (see <br />sketch) <br /> <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br /> <br />Special Use <br />variance <br />Ordinance <br /> <br />Permit and <br />to Zoning <br /> <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: <br /> <br />1. BACKGROUND <br /> <br />Pope Associates are the architects for Systems Control, <br />the company implementing the State-mandated automobile <br />emission testing program. The current proposal on the <br />Partridge Road site is virtually identical to the project <br />proposed previously for the McGee site on County Road C. <br />The applicant decided to drop that reque?t given problems <br />with soils on site and liens on the property. <br /> <br />2. DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY <br /> <br />site Area: <br />Building Area: <br />Percent of Building Coverage: <br />Percent of Lot Landscaped: <br /> <br />50,542 SF 1.16 Acres <br />5,520 SF <br />11 % <br />30 % <br /> <br />3. DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS <br /> <br />Planninq Considerations <br /> <br />The proposed use is appropriate for the site in the 1-2 <br />District. This site is smaller than the previous County <br />Road C site and is encumbered with a City watermain <br />easement and an NSP easement running at an angle through <br />the middle of the property. Therefore, it is difficult to <br />place the proposed building on the site without variances <br />or other special considerations. <br /> <br />The applicant had originally proposed to <br />building parallel to Partridge Road with two <br />site layouts: <br /> <br />place the <br />alternative <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.