Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, March 24, 2014 <br /> Page 16 <br /> wait for reimbursement, since they list this particular project in 2015, but the City <br /> plans to build it in 2014. <br /> Councilmember Etten-requested a copy of that CIP from Ramsey County for <br /> Councilmembers to determine where their list interacted with Roseville's CIP and <br /> Pathway Master Plan and Build-out Update and where those priorities meshed; <br /> with staff duly noting that request. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested that all the items (e.g. PWETC recommendations, Ramsey <br /> County Updated CIP; and City criteria) be included in the draft implementation <br /> plan coming before the City Council as an action item in the future. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Willmus, Mr. Schwartz opined that the 2008 <br /> Pathway Master Plan Update remained valid, as it provided a much broader re- <br /> view than that given by the PWETC, and was based on safety and connectivity <br /> considerations. Councilmember Willmus suggested that the PWETC revisit their <br /> scoring and ranking of these segments to ensure consistent criteria from member <br /> to member. Mr. Schwartz responded that they could do so; however, he asked <br /> that the City Council as a body provide a much clearer definition of that charge, <br /> noting that as the criteria changed, it may draw in a much broader portion of the <br /> community to weigh in on that priority ranking. <br /> Councilmember Willmus opined that the PWETC process was much narrower, <br /> and when these efforts are expended in the future, he would prefer to have much <br /> broader community input rather than having one neighborhood group and their <br /> vocal concerns take precedence over and perhaps providing for a broader docu- <br /> ment. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that, until a different ranking was officially adopted by the <br /> City Council, the 2008 Pathway Master Plan remained as the official document. <br /> Mayor Roe expressed his appreciation for having the cost estimates broken out for <br /> each segment, opining that it further informed the process; and suggested that <br /> those costs be incorporated into the 2008 Plan as the official document. Mayor <br /> Roe also expressed his interest in having timeframes identified for Ramsey Coun- <br /> ty projects to the greatest extent possible to allow that projected timing be incor- <br /> porated in the City's CIP, programming pathway funds into it to define a fixed <br /> annual amount. Mayor Roe suggested a closer look for the twelve year period to <br /> determine how the PWETC recommendations tie into the current CIP projections <br /> and how that may or may not impact funding and projects. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Laliberte, Mr. Schwartz confirmed that Ramsey <br /> County provided an annual update of their 5-year CIP. Councilmember Laliberte <br /> suggested that the PWETC may also want to do an annual review accordingly to <br /> determine any significant changes. <br />