CC_Minutes_2014_0324 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,March 24,2014 Page 44 their transactions were over $100 and anything below that would require them to virtually record every transaction. Mr. Johnston advised that most of their pur- chases are new, and questioned if the City was even aware of their small business before considering this ordinance, as theirs was a tight knit niche-type business and not a big franchise store. Mr. Johnston reviewed the nature of their inventory, most coming from an attic, or off the street from members of the community that they'd known for years even before opening their business six years ago, but fa- miliar faces to them. Mr. Johnston advised that they didn't feel they needed to be part of the proposed ordinance. Mr. Johnston stated that often, a customer will make a purchase off the shelf in their store, and if not what they need, will turn around and resell it or trade it back to them; and with ownership changing possession that quickly, how would they track an item that quickly from a sealed box presented back as a sec- ond hand good; opining that such transactions further supported the need to have such purchases exempted. Brian Banf, Play It Again Sports Having been in operation for several decades, and forced to close his Coon Rapids operation of 15 years as a direct result of that city's adoption of an APS and relo- cating to Roseville, Mr. Banf spoke in opposition to including second hand goods in the ordinance. Elizabeth Elkins, Half Price Books, 2481 Fairview Avenue Ms. Elkins provided written comments as a bench handout at tonight's meeting. Ms. Elkins noted the operation of this store featuring family-owned books in Ro- seville since 2007, with many small items exchanging hand there. Ms. Elkins ad- vised that neither the referenced letter sent out by Chief Mathwig to businesses in February of 2014, nor a notice of the meeting in March of 2014, had been re- ceived by her. If this ordinance is adopted, Ms. Elkins advised that the costs and repercussions would be astronomical for any number of reasons (e.g. investigation fee for li- cense holders, license application submission, annual fee in addition to the $10,000 bond, transaction fee, leased space, digital camera purchase, high speed internet connection, computer equipment, and additional labor). Ms. Elkins re- viewed various sections of the proposed ordinance to support her concerns and as it related specifically to used books, video games, and other items they carried. Ms. Elkins stated that she found the proposal offensive, since they already record- ed driver's license numbers, to which the Police Department should have access to acquire needed information. Ms. Elkins also expressed concern in the perception of attempting to over-regulate business through restriction of store hours, license restrictions if property taxes went unpaid and impacts for business owners leasing their store space, cash trans- actions or store credits to exchange for merchandise, and holding times.