pf_02251 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

store any boats in the winter time closer than 70 feet to the north property line. Mr. Hanson, representing the owner of the property to the north, countered with a proposal to move the screen fence 20 feet south of the property line and to allow the new owner of the lot to have a two year option to purchase the north 15 feet ~f the Slater's property. This would allow them the opportunity to provide additional landscaping and screening adjacent to the property. 6. No final agreement has been reached but disc~ssions continue. 7. The City Council on August 12, 1991, continued consideration of this matter until August 26, 1991. 8. Staff has asked the Dispute Resolution Center to contact the parties- to assist them in working out a solution. Alternatives: 1. Deny the request and allow the marina to òperate as a non- conforming use on the southern parcel only and not on the northern parcel. 2. Approve the planned unit development to remove the non- conforming status of the marina and allow the use of the northern parcel for boat storage and vehicle parking as shown on the plan as recommended by the Planning Commission. 3 . Approve the planned uni t development as requested wi th the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission and with the additional condition that an agreement with the property owner to the north be finalized. 4. continue the request and allow the parties to continue their discussions. Policy Objectives: 1. To insure that development occurs consistent with the City's comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance requirements. 2. To assist businesses providing necessary services to the community. 3. To protect the shorelines and existing lakes within the community. 4. To insure that development does not adversely affect adjacent properties. staff Recommendation: 1. If it is the Council's desire to have agreement finalized before council action is taken, then it may want to consider