My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02312
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2300
>
pf_02312
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:47:26 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 11:09:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2312
Planning Files - Type
Setback Permit
Address
2353 RICE ST
Applicant
ALTRA AUTO RENTAL
Status
APPROVED
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />10 June 1992 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Roseville Planning commission <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Phil Carlson <br /> <br />RE: <br /> <br />Addendum to June Planning Report <br /> <br />Following discussions with Chairman DeBenedet we have prepared <br />some additional information for two of the cases in this month's <br />Planning Report. <br /> <br />2312 <br /> <br />Altra Auto Rental: <br /> <br />There was a question about how much parking was needed in total <br />for the office building at 2353 Rice street and whether the spaces <br />reserved for Altra would infringe on this parking. Currently there <br />are 85 spaces on site for 18,000 net square feet of space in the <br />building, for a parking ratio of 4.7/1,000. This is slightly less <br />than the Code standard of 5/1,000 for offices. Altra has shown 10 <br />spaces reserved for their rental cars. This would reduce the <br />parking to 75 spaces, or a ratio of 4.2/1,000. without a more <br />detailed breakdown of the tenants and employment in the building, <br />we cannot determine for certain if there will be a parking <br />problem, but based on these numbers and the complaints already <br />noted, it appears that Altra will need to keep its parking demand <br />to an absolute minimum, or the" permit cannot be granted. <br /> <br />2393 <br /> <br />Schlosser: <br /> <br />In our planning report we noted that a number of lots in the <br />vicinity of the proposed plat do not meet the current minimum <br />standards in the Code. I have attached a copy of the section map <br />showing the area and several highlighted lots that do not meet the <br />R-l standards for one reason or another. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.