My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02383
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2300
>
pf_02383
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:50:17 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 11:11:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2383
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
970 TRANSIT AVE
Applicant
GISVOLD, ROLAND
Status
DENIED
PIN
112923240029
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING REPORT <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />11 September, 1991 <br /> <br />CASE NUMBER: <br /> <br />2383 <br /> <br />APPLICANT: <br /> <br />Roland Gisvold <br /> <br />LOCATION: <br /> <br />970 Transit Avenue <br /> <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br /> <br />Variance to Zoning <br />Ordinance <br /> <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: <br /> <br />1. BACKGROUND <br /> <br />Mr. Gisvold wants to build a two-car garage to replace the <br />existing single-car garage at his home on Transit Avenue. <br />Since there is not sufficient room in the side yard to expand <br />the existing garage, nor to extend a driveway into the back <br />yard to build a garage there, he would need to build the new <br />garage extending into the front yard. He had previously <br />applied for a minor variance to do the garage expansion, but <br />one of his neighbors did not agree to it, thus requiring him to <br />go through the full variance process. The requested variance <br />is for a 16'-10" front setback instead of the required 27', and <br />a 4'-3" side setback instead of the required 5' (see attached <br />site plan). <br /> <br />A similar variance request in the same neighborhood was <br />approved in 1987, at 938 Transit Avenue. The situation was <br />almost identical: the homeowner replaced a single-car garage <br />with a two-car garage that extended to within 16'-6" of the <br />front lot line, while maintaining a 5' side yard setback. <br /> <br />2. DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS <br /> <br />Mr. Gisvold is proposing a two-car garage of minimum <br />dimensions. Remodelling the house to accomodate the garage <br />within the required setbacks would involve demolition of a <br />portion of the living areas in the house, as can be deduced <br />from the site drawing submitted by the applicant. The new <br />garage would start at the edge of the existing picture windows <br />and is placed in the only feasible location on site. <br /> <br />A garage is not required by City Code for single family homes. <br />Two parking spaces must be provided, but they need not be in a <br />garage, except for residences other than single family. As a <br />practical matter, however, a two-car garage might be considered <br />a necessity today. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.