My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02392
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2300
>
pf_02392
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:50:34 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 11:11:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2392
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Address
2180 DALE ST N
Applicant
BRAUSEN, THEODORE
Status
APPROVED
PIN
022923240047
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />,;34ì <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br />DATE: 5-24-93 <br />ITEM NO.: a-~ <br /> <br />Department Approval: <br /> <br />J5 <br /> <br />Manager Reviewed: <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Agenda section: <br />Hearings <br /> <br />Item Description: <br /> <br />Theodore Brausen request for an amendment to <br />an existing planned unit development at 2164- <br />2180 N. Dale Street. <br /> <br />Backqround: <br /> <br />1. The City has previously approved a planned unit development <br />for Mr. Brausen which has resulted in the renovation of the <br />existing B-Dale Amoco station and the adj acent commercial <br />building to the north. <br /> <br />2 . Mr. Brausen is now requesting an amendment to that approved <br />planned unit development to allow him to change exterior <br />building materials and to have a sign not in the approved <br />sign band. <br /> <br />3. The Roseville Planning Commission unanimously recommended <br />approval of an amendment to the existing planned unit <br />development at 2164-2180 Dale Street as follows: <br /> <br />1. That the north and east side of the north building be <br />brought into compliance with the city design standards <br />within one year and that the applicant post a <br />performance bond with the City to insure that this <br />occurs. <br /> <br />2. That stucco be allowed on the south building as <br />proposed. <br /> <br />The Commission further recommended that the proposed signage <br />change be denied. <br /> <br />Alternatives: <br /> <br />1. Deny the request based on the finding that the proposal is <br />not consistent with the city's zoning ordinance and would be <br />detrimental to the general health, safety, and welfare. <br /> <br />2 . Approve the amendment to the planned uni t development based <br />on the finding that the proposal would be consistent with the <br />City's zoning ordinance and would not be detrimental to the <br />general health, safety, and welfare. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.