Laserfiche WebLink
217 <br />With Ms. Ross noted that BRT staff was intending to recommend deferral of the <br />218 <br />southbound portion of the shelter /stop at Roselawn and Snelling due to very low <br />219 <br />demand, it may not be included in the initial concept plan going to the <br />220 <br />Metropolitan Council for approval later this summer; with fewer than 5 boardings <br />221 <br />per day at current ridership, even though that location was spaced at the preferred <br />222 <br />'/z mile interval. <br />223 <br />intent to have some potential for signal priority to pre -emp signals to some degree <br />249 <br />Member Seigler expressed his concern with the potential for the BRT to have <br />250 <br />signal pri rity over other types of travelers; opining that especially at County <br />251 <br />Road B a Avenue at Snelling, there were long waiting times during <br />252 <br />peak traffi ver could be done to move traffic should be done. <br />Vaember <br />253 <br />254 <br />Mr. Culver, of that study committee, and Ms. Roth reviewed the <br />255 <br />intent to have some potential for signal priority to pre -emp signals to some degree <br />256 <br />to keep the lines moving to connect with the LRT Green Line along University <br />257 <br />Avenue. Mr. Culver explained the logic and coordination to minimally adjust the <br />258 <br />signal cycle, based on demand read from other approaches as well; and not <br />259 <br />included in the ability for emergency vehicles to pre -emp signal lights from their <br />260 <br />overall cycle. Mr. Culver assured Mr. Seigler that consideration would be given <br />261 <br />to those intersections already operating at peak capacity, and may not be included <br />Page 6 of 12 <br />