My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02458
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2400
>
pf_02458
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:52:26 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 11:32:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2458
Planning Files - Type
Vacation Right-of-Way
Address
2800 ARONA ST
Applicant
BIERSCHEID, BOB
Status
APPROVED
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />PLUDlING REPORT <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />9 september 1992 <br /> <br />CASE NUMBER: <br /> <br />2458 <br /> <br />APPLICANT: <br /> <br />City of Roseville <br /> <br />LOCATION: <br /> <br />Fernwood street between <br />County Road C & Woodhill <br /> <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br /> <br />Vacation of Street <br />Right-of-Way <br /> <br />1. BACKGROUND <br /> <br />The City is planning to build the John Rose Minnesota Oval skating <br />facility adjacent to the existing Roseville Ice Arena and needs to <br />vacate a segment of Fernwood Street for the project. The Planning <br />Commission considered the street vacation request at its last <br />meeting, where several issues were raised. These are discussed in <br />more detail below and in the attached materials. The four major <br />issues are: <br /> <br />1) Sanitary sewer (MWCC interceptor) <br />2) Traff ic <br />3) Parking <br />4) Environmental issues <br /> <br />The first two issues are directly related to the street vacation, <br />since the sewer easement is within the Fernwood right-of-way and <br />traffic on Woodhill might be affected by the closing of this <br />portion of Fernwood. <br /> <br />The other two issues are only indirectly related to the vacation <br />request and do not fall under the technical items that should be <br />considered for review of this street vacation request. To be <br />consistent with review of private development projects, the proper <br />time to consider the parking plan would be when the site plan for <br />the Oval is reviewed. As a City building, the new Oval is a <br />permitted use in the R-1 District. within the site plan review <br />process the number and location of parking spaces would be <br />compared to the Code requirements. If it is determined that there <br />is insufficient parking on the Oval - site, then we would discuss <br />shared parking, parking management, event scheduling, etc. , to <br />satisfy the concerns, and if necessary, recommend specific <br />conditions of approval, a variance, or an Interim Use Permit for <br />the facility. The Planning Commission would review the plans if <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.