Laserfiche WebLink
<br />virqinia Tschida, Case No. 2466 <br /> <br />paqe 2 <br /> <br />3. DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS <br /> <br />Plannina Considerations <br /> <br />The request is for a simple lot split, and both parcels exceed the <br />minimum standards for lots in the R-1 District. Even though Mrs. <br />Tschida's parcel was platted as an outlot to prevent development <br />of lots fronting on the Western Avenue curve, there is nothing to <br />prevent the owner of the newly subdivided parcel from applying for <br />a building permit on the lot, unless specific conditions are <br />attached to the approval of this lot division. <br /> <br />with Outlot A owned solely by Mrs. Tschida, any desire to develop <br />the property could make use of the Stanbridge Circle cul-de-sac as <br />envisioned in the original plat. with a parcel being sold to Mr. <br />Cave, this new parcel no longer has any street access except to <br />the Western Avenue curve. Either Mrs. Tschida would have to <br />dedicate an access easement from Stanbridge Circle to the Cave <br />parcel (which she has said. she does not want to do) or the ci ty <br />would have to allow access to Western Avenue at some point. <br /> <br />Enaineering Considerations <br /> <br />The concern over driveway access to Western Avenue in the original <br />plat may not be supported by generally accepted engineering <br />standards. The speed limit on Western is 30 mph, but the curve is <br />signed with 25 mph speed limit signs. The inside radius of the <br />curve on Western Avenue is about 270', greater (and therefore <br />safer) than the 215' minimum radius recommended for a 30 mph <br />curve. <br /> <br />Minimum sight distance for stopping at 30 mph is 200', i.e., a <br />driver seeing an obstacle in the road would be able to react and <br />brake to a stop within 200' from the moment he or she first <br />spotted the obstacle. This sight distance can be maintained <br />within the right-of-way for any point on the Western Avenue curve <br />as illustrated on the attached sketch, for a driver in the driving <br />lane seeing an obstacle wi thin the street pavement. In other <br />words, no obstruction on private property (trees, shrubs, fence, <br />etc.) outside the right-of-way would interfere with this 200' <br />sight line. <br /> <br />To be safe, however, it might be appropriate to keep any such <br />obstructions to visibility an additional 10' outside the <br />right-of-way, especially in the case of landscaping that could <br />grow toward the right-of-way over the years. This could be <br />accomplished with an easement that would prohibit any obstruction <br />to visibility within the first 10' of the front yard on Western <br />Avenue. overstory deciduous trees could be allowed as long as <br />their canopies were above a driver's eye level, since the trunk <br />