pf_02471 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

KBKORANDUK DATE: 9 December 1992 TO: Roseville Planning commission FROM: Philip Carlson, Dahlgren, Shardlow, and Uban RE: sign Ordinance Discussion We are hoping to address a number of issues tonight related to our ongoing discussion of the Sign Ordinance. ·Some are old issues, some are new. Some will require Planning Commission action, some are for informational purposes only. Seasonal Sians 'Banners. Attached is our two-page memorandum of 7/20/92. This memo summarizes the proposals for dealing with temporary signs and special events signs, including seasonal signs and banners, flags, and grand opening decorations. These suggestions were not included in the recent amendments to the Code, at the request of the City Council, who wanted churches and others to have another opportunity to express their wishes before action was taken. The Planning Commission has already passed this material on to the city Council after considerable discussion and a recommendation, but Chairman DeBenedet has asked us to review the options and summarized the standards again since some of the issues are controversial. Area churches have been notified of the discussion taking place tonight and we expect some representatives to come and comment. The city Council will take up the issue again at their January 21 work session, and church representatives will be invited to that session as well. Wall Sianaae for Multi-Tenant Buildinas. Attached are three drawings illustrating different wall signage situations for a multi-tenant commercial or industrial building. The size standards for signage are based on the area of the building facade facing the street frontage, and reveal a situation we had not anticipated in our earlier discussions: The first sketch, Corner Lot, shows a typical strip center building on a corner lot (two street frontages) with various signs on a sign band and the new Code standards on the lower part of the page. The standards are reasonable for this arrangement.