My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02471
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2400
>
pf_02471
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:53:18 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 11:32:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2471
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Address
674 COUNTY ROAD C W
Applicant
PARKRIDGE DEVELOPMENT
Status
WITHDRWN
PIN
112923110007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />water must be picked up with a catch basin or grade the property so the <br />water does not stand in one location. <br /> <br />4. t9NCLUSION AND RECOMMENDA TION~ <br /> <br />It is staffs belief that the proposed use of this site for townhome development <br />would be appropriate if the City's Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan is <br />amended to designate this area for medium density residential. As the <br />Planning Commission has progressed in their work on the Comprehensive <br />Land :Use Guide Plan update goals and policies relative to housing have been <br />formulated. In addition criteria has been developed to be applied to proposals <br />for multiple family dwelling construction within the City. These goals, <br />policies and critera are attached to· this planning report. This proposed <br />townhome development meets most of those criteria, and it is for these <br />reasons the staff believes this is an appropriate location for townhouse <br />development within the City ofRoseville. There are specific design <br />çonsiderations for this project that must still be resolved. Specifically they <br />relate to the interface with the property to the east and whether or not that <br />property will become a part oftbis project or will need to have additional <br />sçreening to protect it. The issue of on-site surface water storage verses a V <br />regional storm water tàcility must still be resotvéd and the question of private ~ <br />verses public streets should be addressed. Given resolution to these issues it ~ ~4 <br />is staffs recommendation that the application ofParlaidge Development 'IJY ~ <br />Corporation for a PUD Concept Development Plan ApprOval. rezoning from 'fY <br />R-l to Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat at 674,656 and 646 <br />W. County Road C should be approved. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.