My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02471
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2400
>
pf_02471
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:53:18 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 11:32:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2471
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Address
674 COUNTY ROAD C W
Applicant
PARKRIDGE DEVELOPMENT
Status
WITHDRWN
PIN
112923110007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANB:I:NG REPORT <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />9 December 1992 <br /> <br />CASE NUMBER: <br /> <br />2471 <br /> <br />APPLICANT: <br /> <br />parkridge Development Corp. <br />Al Kehr, Partner <br /> <br />LOCATION: <br /> <br />674 W. county Road C <br />(West of Dale street) <br /> <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br /> <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment <br />Planned unit Development <br />General Development Plan <br /> <br />1. BACKGROUND <br /> <br />Mr. Al Kehr and his partners own three deep single-family lots on <br />county Road C on which they are proposing a residential PUD <br />consisting of 29 townhouse units, to be called Parkridge Estates. <br />The property is currently guided LR Low Density Residential and is <br />zoned R-1. The proposal requires a change in the Comprehensive <br />Plan Land Use designation to KR Medium Density Residential, and a <br />rezoning to Planned unit Development with an underlying zoning of <br />R-6 Townhouse District. <br /> <br />The project is related to one proposed by Mr. Kehr in 1985 on one <br />of the three lots. That proposal involved a rezoning to R-2, a <br />variance on density, and a special Use Permit for a PUD. Under <br />the current Code all of these issues can be handled within the PUD <br />process. The project consisted of 13 units on the westernmost lot <br />(1.55 acres) and was turned down by the City Council.. Mr. Kehr <br />then sued the city, asking for the rezoning to be granted. The <br />court ruled in the city's favor and the project did not go ahead. <br /> <br />since then, Mr. Kehr has acquired two more lots to the east of the <br />original lot, more than doubling the land area involved. The new <br />project is similar in character and density to the previous <br />project, and the units themselves are similar in size and design. <br />The earlier project was served by a single cul-de-sac drive; the <br />current project has a loop street with two access drives to County <br />Road C. The 1985 project was 8.4 units/acre, this project is <br />slightly less dense, at 7.9 units/acre. <br /> <br />We have met several times wi th Mr. Kehr and his archi tects to <br />discuss the overall layout and design of the project, noting on <br />several occasions that it is not guaranteed that this basic land <br />use will be approved in this location. The Planning commission <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.