pf_02477 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Page 1# 2 r Planning Office Hours Howard Dahlgren April 13, 1988 ( c the total sq. ft. area would continue to conform to the zoning ordinance. 3. with respect to the canopy sign, they agreed to redesign the canopy and the sign so as to have it constitute a wall sign. This could be done by carrying through the wall detail from the building through the canopy signs, and reducing the sign area so as to be an attached sign rather than constitute the face of the canopy only (as originally proposed). We noted that an electronic sign with a traveling message has been ruled a flashing sign, but that in a previous bank application a time and temperature continuously lit sign was allowed at 1 and 1: 30 minute intervals, followed by a 13 minute fixed message. We suggested that within these parameters, the sign would not be "flashing sign" and could be approved. We agreed that they could revise their sign proposals within th~se parameters for a subsequent review. We also discussed future ramifications of their location as it relates principally to the redevelopment area to the west. We all agreed that the potential is excellent and that their facility should work well on their site. O'Meara (633-0246) Barry 0 'Meara is proposing to redevelop and finish the 16 unit PUD just south of the "trailer courts", west of Lexington. Carol Tanning of Merrill Lynch (636-9000) was with Mr. O'Meara and will be marketing their end product. Mr. O'Meara noted that he is still negotiating with the bank to take over the project. We discussed a revised plan which included an option of two one story town house units at each end of a four story structure with two story units in the center. The other option would be four one story units, though this building takes additional length and would result in the setback of 10 feet on the side lot contiguous to the rear of the homes to the south of the site. Each unit would have two garages, plus additional space for parking in front of the garage and other spaces off the access drive. They are of the opinion that the one story units would attract a good market in Roseville where they perceive many persons to reside in their single family homes, but in need of accommodations fit for the elderly. It was agreed that a revised PUD would be the appropriate method of handling the revised design, and it would be most important for them to relate directly to the neighbors regarding the change in configuration. It would appear that / .-y ---7\