Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />April 20, 1988 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Jim Andre <br /> <br />SUBJECT: PLANNING OFFICE HOURS, April 13, 1988 <br /> <br />Howard Dahlgren <br /> <br />{ <br /> <br />(l <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />Tolmateer {645-0223} <br /> <br />Rick Tolmateer is with Universal sign company, and was in <br />with Rudy Samstegard from Donaldsons Department stores who <br />is with their Operation's Facility Division. They announced <br />that Donaldson's is going to change the name of their store <br />to Carson Pirie Scott. Accordingly, they proposed to change <br />the signage on the exterior of their department store at <br />Rosedale. The existing sign consists of three 176 sq. ft. <br />signs, and the new signs will be two at 211 sq. ft. and one <br />at 160 sq. ft. These letters are mounted directly on the <br />brick, and thus are measured 6 inches around the letter as <br />noted in the ordinance. Based on the percentage of wall <br />space, it can be occupied by a sign in the shopping center <br />district. Each of the three new signs conforms to ordinance <br />requirements, and will be smaller than that allowed. We <br />also noted that we wanted to be assured that the shopping <br />center management (The Center companies) agrees with these <br />changes, in as much as the city does not want to review <br />signage for individual stores, and not under control of the <br />center. <br /> <br />The signs will be lit with a translucent face light from <br />behind at night. No source of light will be visible. They <br />were informed they could proceed with applications for sign <br />permits. <br /> <br />2. Lohman (375-1260) <br /> <br />Tom Lohman, the developer for the Investor savings Bank <br />proposal in the Fine Associates Company PUD was in with Tom <br />Ruvelson, and Connie Hesse, both from Sign Consultants <br />along with Robin Roberts and Jim Berghweter (542-8000) both <br />from Investors Bank, and Tom Sweeny, attorney (222-2541). <br />We reviewed the signage proposals for the proposed bank. We <br />agreed that the overall signage allowanée for area is equal <br />to the signs proposed, minus the electronic canopy sign <br />originally indicated on the drawings. We agreed that they <br />would adjust the sign sizes of the overall building, so that <br />