pf_02483 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSBVILLB PLANNING OPFICB BOURS 9/30/92 3 (Note: Each month the City staff reviews the planning files for completeness and for compliance with Code and design standards in preparation for upcoming Planning Commission meetings. I am including notes from this review in thesè weekly memos both for the benefit of readers and for our record keeping. - Phil Carlson) DeveloDment Review for October 15 Planninq Commission Meetinq: 2475 Borgeson/Lot Division: The request is reasonable since the parcel was two lots previously. We need a survey of the new lot with the new right -of -way for Sextant Avenue. We agreed to recommend approval conditioned on the applicant providing a survey. A previous Council resolution prohibits any building permits on new Sextant Avenue until an assessment dispute is settled involving two property owners on the Sextant cul-de-sac. We will see if this applies to this interior lot. Even if it does, we can approve the lot division but hold off on a building permit. 2476 Rosedale/Sign Variance for Additional Directional Signs: Given the context within the Rosedale Center, the additional signs are reasonable. Not having them would pose a practical difficulty, justifying a variance. The moratorium on sign variances may be up in October and the variance could be considered. This is reasonable since the provisions dealing with commercial directional signs have been studied and agreed upon. Based on Council direction, staff has proceeded with this application. 2478 Fine Associates/Interim Use Permit for Temporary Parking Lot and Temporary Off-Premises Real Estate Sign: '* * * * * '* '* No curb or paving is proposed for the interim parking lot. No drainage plan or landscape plan submitted. Engineering staff is concerned about drainage, gravel on the streets, and silt into the storm sewer system. -For Sale- sign on Olive Garden site for vacant Lot 5 is off-premise, but similar to what would be allowed if Olive Garden were for sale. There is probably ample parking in the area already but Olive Garden and Roseville Bank do not seem to be able to come to an agreement. The Bank appears to have much more parking than they currently need. Typically the City looks for some -give & take- in IUPs. The City does not get much in return here for this IUP. '* * '*