My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02505
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2500
>
pf_02505
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:55:40 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 11:48:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2505
Planning Files - Type
Special Use Permit
Address
10 ROSEDALE CENTER
Applicant
COMPUTER CITY/BEECHWOOD ACQ
Status
APPROVED
PIN
122923140002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 2 <br />Rick Jopke <br />May 20, 1993 <br /> <br />Using the traffic volumes of 500 vehicle trips per day that were <br />presented at the Planning Commission meeting by the Beachwood <br />Companies, it does not appear that the traffic generated by <br />Computer City will significantly increase the existing traffic <br />concerns at the intersection of the east/west drive lane and main <br />entrance of the Crossroads project. <br /> <br />The placement of the exit from Computer City at the easterly end <br />of the building will reduce the number of left turning movements <br />directly adjacent to the main entrance into the Crossroads Center. <br />The engineering staff has not reviewed traffic movements related <br />to the various optional placements of the building and would need <br />to review these site plans to make accurate interpretations of <br />the traffic flow. <br /> <br />In summary, traffic studies have been conducted on the county <br />Road B-2/Snelling Avenue corridors, and BRW found that there are <br />not significant problems in these areas at this time. After <br />engineering review of the proposed site plan with this specific <br />building location, the proposed one-way alignment best satisfies <br />the traffic concerns raised by the Planning commission. <br /> <br />If you have any questions, please call me at 221. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.