My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02509
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2500
>
pf_02509
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:55:54 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 11:48:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2509
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
1524 COUNTY ROAD C2 W
Applicant
LUND, CLIFFORD
Status
APPROVED
PIN
032923320016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />C1i~ford Lund, Case No. 2509 <br /> <br />paqe 2 <br /> <br />In this case, the church fronts on an odd-shaped piece of <br />right-of-way for the frontage road (see attached sketch). The <br />right-of-way lines do not parallel the frontage. road at this <br />corner of the church property, thus creating a much deeper <br />boulevard than is usual or necessary. This is due to the shape of <br />the existing parcels that were acquired for the frontage road <br />right-of-way, which was put in long after snelling Avenue was <br />built. staying back 30' from this line does not serve the public <br />purpose for which front setbacks are intended and puts the <br />property in an unfair position compared to other properties along <br />this same street. Due to its shape and size, it is unlikely that <br />the piece of right-of-way immediately adjacent to the proposed <br />sign would ever be developed for any purpose, and if it did, then <br />the sign would be in a side yard and not a front yard needing a <br />30' setback. <br /> <br />We have illustrated the situation on the attached site plan. The <br />actual right-of-way line is shown abutting the church property. <br />We have sketched in an "imaginary extension" of the right-of-way <br />line, which is where the right-of-way would be if it parallelled <br />the frontage road in a more typical situation. We have shown a <br />30' setback from this imaginary line. As the sketch shows, the <br />location of the sign at the proposed 5' setback is still behind a <br />30' setback from the imaginary extension of the right-of-way. In <br />other words, the sign location meets the intent, if not the <br />letter, of the setback ordinance. <br /> <br />3. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />The church is allowed a sign of reasonable size at a reasonable <br />setback. If the right-of-way configuration at this property edge <br />were more normal, the proposed location would be acceptable. The <br />applicant did not create this situation. The unfair position they <br />are in relative to other similarly situated properties can be <br />considered a hardship. We recommend approval of the variance <br />request with the condition that the existing sign be removed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.