My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014_0609_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2014
>
2014_0609_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2014 1:53:18 PM
Creation date
6/5/2014 1:38:57 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
378
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment B <br />March 14, 2014 <br />Page 2 <br />The only other alternative for the City, if it wishes to create a fully-empowered Park Board, <br />would be to gain statutory permission from the state legislature. Specifically, the City would <br />need a special law to be enacted that permits the City of Roseville to create a Park Board despite <br />the fact that it is an Optional Plan B City. The process to gain such statutory permission would <br />be as follows: <br />1. The City ��vill need to be united in its pursuit of statutary permission for a Park Board. I <br />would suggest that such unity could be demonstrated through the Parks Commission <br />adopting a resolution declaring its support for Park Board legislation, followed by a <br />similar resolution adopted by the City Council. Because this is a purely political pursuit, <br />it v��ould be important that these resolutions be adopted in a near-unanimous fashion. If <br />the City's leadership is divided on this issue, then the prospects of gaining legislative <br />support diminish. <br />2. Armed with the demonstrated support of City leadership, one or more local legislative <br />representatives will need to shoulder the burden of authoring a bill and undertaking the <br />burden of getting the bill passed through appropriate committees within their chamber of <br />the legislature, followed by a majority vote of the entirety of the chamber. Then, the bill <br />will have to pass by majority vote in the other chamber of the legislature and, finally, <br />signed into law by the Go��ernor. Along the way, City leadership and the community as a <br />whole �vill likely need to lobby the legislature to support the bill. The first step in this <br />process, ho�vever, v�-ill be to convince at least one local legislative representative <br />undertake this project. <br />I hope this information is helpful. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. <br />Very truly yours, <br />ERICKSON, BELL, BECKMAN & QUINN, P.A. <br />�L��� <br />Mark F. Gaughan <br />MFG/kmw <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.