Laserfiche WebLink
<br />_~ b _.'naorparBCed <br /> <br /> <br />1313 5th street s.e. · suite322 · minneapolis.mn55414 <br />telephone: 812-331-4571 · fax: 812-331-4572 <br /> <br />2 February 1994 <br /> <br />Michael Falk <br />city of Roseville <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville, MN 55113 <br /> <br />RE: Advance Circuits - Noise Measurements at Anderson Residence <br /> <br />Dear Mike: <br /> <br />We were able to take advantage of the January thaw to make noise measurements <br />at the Anderson residence. We began monitoring as soon as the temperature <br />began moderating, but unfortunately the first night was lost due to the cold. <br />However, we were able to obtain readings for three consecutive nights when <br />both the temperature and wind permitted the collection of reliable data. <br />These dates were (Saturday (Jan 22-23), Sunday (Jan 23-24) and Monday (Jan 24- <br />25). Three nights were monitored since the the first night and then the <br />second night showed readings substantially below the readings taken last June. <br /> <br />Sound propagation in the winter with snow cover is similar to sound propaga- <br />tion in summer with grass and leaves. Actually, the attenuation under winter <br />conditions may be less. Snow on the roof provides more absorption of sound <br />than the hard roof, although the distance between the source and the edge of <br />the roof is small. Therefore, this effect is likely to be less than 1 dBA. <br /> <br />The readings were taken without the knowledge of Advance Circuits. However, <br />we also had no knowledge of what equipment was operating at the time. The <br />readings taken during this time period are comparable to those taken in June <br />only if all equipment that might be used throughout the year was in operation. <br />Dan Mccarthy of Advance Circuits was contacted on 1 February 1994 to check on <br />equipment operation during the monitoring periods. He indicated that all <br />equipment was operating normally during that period. <br /> <br />The results of the noise readings are summarized on the attached graphs. <br />These measurements demonstrate a significant reduction in noise level (9 dBA <br />in the quietest period) from the readings taken in June 1993. They also indi- <br />cate that the L50 sound levels remained below the 50 dBA standard except for <br />small (1 dBA) excedance between 6-7 am on Tuesday morning. This could easily <br />be due to traffic noise in the area which generally increases during this time <br />period. <br />