My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0522
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0522
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2014 12:41:40 PM
Creation date
6/10/2014 12:41:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/22/2014
Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Special City Council Meeting <br /> Thursday, May 22, 2014 <br /> Page 22 <br /> At the request of Councilmember Willmus, Mr. Trudgeon confirmed that person- <br /> nel costs that had increased upon his appointment as Interim City Manager had <br /> been rolled back. At the request of Councilmember Willmus, Mr. Trudgeon ad- <br /> vised that he anticipated the HRA coming forward with their 2015 budget request <br /> in June or July, at which time they were scheduled for a joint meeting with the <br /> City Council. At the request of Councilmember, Mr. Trudgeon confirmed, along <br /> with Councilmember Etten, City Council member of the HRA that the 2014 HRA <br /> budget included $25,000 for business retention and economic development (BR& <br /> E) efforts. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Etten, noted that current BR & E expenses had <br /> only been $5,000 to-date; and before he agreed to increase permit fees to support <br /> a$25,000 allotment for 2014, he would need to see a more detailed budget and in- <br /> tended uses. Councilmember Etten acknowledged that the HRA budget wasn't <br /> yet fully lined up, and he understood that the allotment may be expended over the <br /> remainder of 2014, he expressed concern that the City increase their allotment be- <br /> fore that point of clarification was made. In rationalizing his concerns, Coun- <br /> cilmember Etten opined that, in an effort to promote development, caution was <br /> needed to not increase fees to the level that discouraged people making improve- <br /> ments. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Etten, Mr. Trudgeon clarified that no increases <br /> in permit fees had been outlined yet, with the exception of normal annual infla- <br /> tionary costs, there was nothing tied to the proposed 2015 projected expenses and <br /> raising fees. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that fee revenue was increasing to levels experienced consist- <br /> ently several years ago, and was basically driven by improved economics and ac- <br /> tivities. <br /> Councilmember Willmus clarified and reminded Councilmembers that the City <br /> Council did not set the HRA budget, only the levy portion. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Laliberte, Mr. Trudgeon detailed the projected <br /> increases for 2015 from those of 2014: <br /> • An increase of$15,000 for studies for a total of$20,000 specific to economic <br /> development <br /> • Non-levy inflationary increases of$90,000 <br /> • Overall budget increase from $1.34 million to proposed $1.44 million; with <br /> $90,000 from the CDD Fund, and the remaining from levy-supported funds <br /> and attributed to inflationary personnel and supply costs. <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, Mr. Trudgeon reported that the next scheduled <br /> comprehensive plan update was scheduled for 2017, and would be a line item in <br /> that year's budget. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.