My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014_0616_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2014
>
2014_0616_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2014 1:54:21 PM
Creation date
6/12/2014 2:23:44 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 21 <br />PUBLIC DOCUMENT-TRADE SECRET DATA HAS BEEN EXCISED <br />Proposal for Formal Franchise Renewal <br />December 20, 2013 <br />viewers can and do prefer to receive local news and information—and most if <br />not all of the programming that might appear on PEG channels — through other <br />means, including internet and live streaming. In sum, more content on fewer <br />channels will enhance and not reduce the quality of PEG programming. The <br />NSCC Staff, through its report, has not shown a substantial need for 8 PEG <br />channels. <br />In short, the Staff Report, the RFRP, and the NSCC's consultant reports do <br />not provide a basis to support the NSCCs demand for 8 PEG channels, HD <br />channels dedicated to PEG, and video-on-demand resources for PEG.40 The <br />RFRP violates the Cable Act and the First Amendment in this respect. <br />Payments for PEG Capital Costs. Section 622(g)(2)(C) excludes from the <br />term "franchise fee" any "capital costs which are required by the franchise to be <br />incurred by the cable operator for public, educational, or governmental access <br />facilities." The FCC has made clear that any such capital requirements made of <br />a cable operator are not subject to the 5% franchise fee standard.41 Though PEG <br />capital costs are not subject to the 5% franchise fee cap, they remain subject to <br />the Cable Act's "reasonableness" requirement and that such LFA requests be <br />supported by an evaluation of PEG related community needs. <br />The NSCC RFRP says that Comcast "shall voluntarily pay" $14,160,740 to <br />the NSCC over 10 years for additional capital costs to be allocated "in the sole <br />discretion" of the NSCC.42 The RFRP states that this "voluntary requirement" is <br />supported in the NSCC Staff Report, Needs Assessment Report, and CBG's <br />Technical Review Report. But a close examination of the NSCC Staff Report, <br />Needs Assessment Report, and CBG's Technical Review Report reveals little or <br />no documentation of any current or future need justifying a demand for any <br />PEG capital requirement from Comcast much less one of this size. The NSCC's <br />demand for such equipment is therefore unreasonable and under the Cable Act <br />Comcast is not required to comply with it. <br />Payments for PEG Operating Costs. Section 622(g)(1) of the Cable Act <br />defines a franchise fee as "any tax, fee, or assessment of any kind imposed by a <br />franchising authority ... on a cable operator or cable subscriber, or both, solely <br />because of their status as such." The FCC has been clear that this provision <br />requires that any required financial support other than reasonable capital <br />40. Preferred Comm., Inc.,1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20205 at *36. <br />41. 621 Order ¶109; Second 621 Order ¶13. <br />42. RFRP at 65-66. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.