My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014_0616_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2014
>
2014_0616_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2014 1:54:21 PM
Creation date
6/12/2014 2:23:44 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC DOCUMENT-TRADE SECRET DATA HAS BEEN EXCISED <br />Comcast of Minnesota <br />Page 22 <br />expenditures for PEG facilities must be calculated as part of this franchise fee <br />and subject to this 5% cap.�3 <br />The Staff Report and the RFRP repeatedly and without pretext demand <br />PEG operating support °over and above franchise fees and all other financial <br />and in-kind commitments."44 The report specifically demands an average of <br />$1.3 million per year in PEG operational support, with a 2% increase per year.45 <br />The RFRP requires Comcast to make these substantial PEG operating grants to <br />the NSCC and NSAC but would not allow these grants to represent any part of <br />the limited franchise fee that the LFAs are allowed to collect. The RFRP also <br />requires Comcast — on top of the substantial grants to the NSCC and NSAC — to <br />pay the statutory maximum franchise fee of 5% of gross revenues.46 Prohibiting <br />the franchise fee from being offset required by the PEG operating grants <br />violates the Cable Act. <br />I-Net Demands. As mentioned above, the NSCC report and RFRP <br />condition renewal on Comcast's contribution to the member cities of a free data <br />and telecommunications network ("I-Net") that would provide voice, video, <br />data, and internet-access services for the member cities. <br />Section 621(b) (3) (D) does not affirmatively authorize demands on cable <br />operators to construct and provide I-Nets free of cost to LFAs.47 Section 611(b) <br />allows LFAs to seek capacity on an I-Net that the cable operator has chosen to <br />build for its own commercial purposes, but only for providing "channel <br />capacity [that may] be designated for public, educational, or governmental <br />use."48 Thus to the extent the NSCC demands an I-Net that does not serve the <br />43. 621 Order ¶¶ 43-44, 94-96,105. <br />44. Staff Report at 38, 67-68, 74, 78, 90, 93. <br />45. Id. at 73-74. <br />46. Id. at 99. <br />47. 47 U.S.C. � 541(b) (3) (D) ("Except as otherwise permitted by sections 531 <br />and 532 of this title, a franchising authority may not require a cable operator to <br />provide any telecommunications service or facilities, other than institutional <br />networks, as a condition of the initial grant of a franchise, a franchise renewal, or a <br />transfer of a franchise."). <br />48. 47 U.S.C. � 531(b) ("A franchising authority may in its request for <br />proposals require as part of a franchise, and may require as part of a cable <br />operator's proposal for a franchise renewal, subject to section 546 of this title, that <br />channel capacity be designated for public, educational, or governmental use, and <br />channel capacity on institutional networks be designated for educational or <br />governmental use, and may require rules and procedures for the use of the channel <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.