Laserfiche WebLink
PUBLIC DOCUMENT—TRADE SECRET DATA HAS BEEN EXCISED <br />Comcast of Minnesota <br />Page 24 <br />INet." Metro INet provides a suite of IT, data, and telephony services to at least <br />140 local governmental sites within and outside the NSCC franchise area, and <br />has been used to directly complete with Comcast in bids to provide services to <br />third parties.52 As of October 2012, the City of Roseville collected nearly <br />$500,000 in service fees from Metro INet customers pursuant to joint powers <br />agreements executed with local governmental customers.53 <br />The Staff Report and RFRP make demands for a significant and expensive <br />institutional network, as well as continued maintenance and upgrades of that <br />network — and demand it all as an in-kind contribution to the NSCC and <br />member cities.s4 <br />To the extent that the RFRI''s I-Net demands contravene the Cable Act <br />and other laws, and to the extent the NSCC requires an I-Net in-kind <br />contribution without attributing that amount to the 5% franchise-fee cap, <br />Comcast objects. <br />Technology, Transmission, and Equipment Demands. Section 624(e) of <br />the Cable Act preempts LFAs from regulating equipment and transmission <br />technologies of an applicant cable provider: "No State or franchising authority <br />may prohibit, condition, or restrict a cable system's use of any type of <br />subscriber equipment or any transmission technology."Sy The legislative history <br />shows that Congress was trying "to avoid the effects of disjointed local <br />regulation" and enacted this provision to "prohibit States or franchising <br />authorities from regulating in the areas of technical standards, customer <br />equipment, and transmission technologies." 56 <br />52. The resale of Comcast I-Net services by the City of Roseville violates <br />section 7(c) of the franchise. Comcast objects to this continuing violation of the <br />franchise. <br />53. See Ex. 11 (Roseville Joint Powers Summary). Comcast can provide a copy <br />of any specific joint-powers agreement referenced in Exhibit 11 at the NSCCs <br />request. Also an October 2013 presentation to Roseville's City Council noted $1 <br />million in savings from its non-PEG-related use and collection of over $1 million in <br />revenue from offering the Metro INet commercially. City of Roseville, Overview of <br />the IT Function £� Metro-INET Group, <br />http: // www.ci.roseville.mn.us / DocumentCenter / View / 12807. <br />54. Id. at 3-4,19, 20, 23-24, 46, 49-60; RFRP at 16-18. <br />55. 47 U.S.C. � 544(e). <br />56. H.R. Rep. No. 104-204(I), at 110 (1995), reprinted in 1996 U.S.C.C.A.N. 10, <br />77. <br />