My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014_0616_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2014
>
2014_0616_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2014 1:54:21 PM
Creation date
6/12/2014 2:23:44 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 23 <br />PUBLIC DOCUMENT-TRADE SECRET DATA HAS BEEN EXCISED <br />Proposal for Formal Franchise Renewal <br />December 20, 2013 <br />function of carrying channels of PEG programming, and is in fact a demand for <br />a complimentary telecommunications and data pipeline for municipalities—the <br />demand violates the Cable Act. <br />Indeed, applying the Cable Act's provision barring LFAs from <br />unreasonably refusing to grant franchises, the FCC's 621 Order found that <br />LFAs cannot deny a franchise based on an applicant's "refusal to undertake <br />certain obligations relating to [PEG] and institutional networks."49 The 621 <br />Order also clarified what kinds of "in-kind" franchise requirements are counted <br />in determining whether a local franchising authority (LFA) has exceeded the <br />5% of gross revenue cap on franchise fees. The FCC held that "in-kind" <br />mandatory payments required by LFA's which are unrelated to the provision of <br />cable services are not expenses "incidental" to the award or enforcement of a <br />franchise, and count toward the 5%-franchise-fee cap. Examples of in-kind <br />payments cited by the FCC as constituting franchise fees include fiber optic <br />cabling for traffic light control systems, scholarship funds, money for <br />wildflower seeds, and video hookups for a Christmas celebration.s� Thus, to the <br />extent that the NSCCs I-Net is not related to the provision of cable service, the <br />value of the free I-Net demanded by the NSCC Staff constitutes franchise fees <br />which count toward the 5% cap. The NSCC admits as much in its Staff Report, <br />stating that I-Net facilities, equipment, and capabilities are "in-kind <br />compensation" for the use of the ROW.51 <br />The Staff Report also provides no documentation supporting its <br />conclusions that a community need and interest exist for the I-Net. The Staff <br />Report provides no information regarding the NSCCs current levels of use of <br />the existing I-Net provided by Comcast. <br />Notwithstanding the NSCC's failure to document the community need <br />and interest for an I-Net, Comcast has become aware that the City of Roseville <br />(an NSCC Member City) has leveraged the Comcast-provided I-Net into its <br />own proprietary wide area network which the City has brand named "Metro <br />capacity designated pursuant to this section."); 47 U.S.C. � 531(f) ("the term <br />'institutional network' means a communication network which is constructed or <br />operated by the cable operator and which is generally available only to subscribers <br />who are not residential subscribers"). <br />49. 621 Order ¶¶ 5,110. <br />50. Id. at ¶¶106-107. <br />51. Staff Report at 23. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.