Laserfiche WebLink
<br />¿fUll <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br />DATE: 9-27-93 <br /> <br />ITEM NO.: <br /> <br />F--2 <br /> <br />Manager Reviewed: Agenda section: <br />~ c:!)- Reports and Recommendations <br /> <br />~ent Approval: <br /> <br />Item Description: <br /> <br />Sarah Cave request for a division of a platted <br />lot at 2271 Western Avenue. <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />1. The applicant owns a lot immediately west of the lot at 2271 <br />Western Avenue and is proposing to divide off a portion of the <br />large lot at 2271 Western Avenue to combine with the narrow lot <br />at 398 Minnesota Avenue. This would provide another buildable <br />lot in the City of Roseville while maintaining current <br />subdivision standards for the large lot and existing home. <br /> <br />2. The lot division request is illustrated on the attached site <br />plan. The parcel under consideration fronts on both Western <br />Avenue and Minnesota Avenue. The total parcel size is 19,560 <br />sq. ft. An existing house is located on the 2271 Western <br />Avenue lot where the lot at 398 Minnesota Avenue is currently <br />vacant. The property under consideration is zoned R-1, single <br />family. The applicant wishes to split a 25 foot strip along <br />Minnesota Avenue, from the 2271 Western Avenue lot and combine <br />that strip with the 398 Minnesota Avenue lot, bringing the <br />frontage of that lot up to 80 feet. The lot on Western Avenue <br />would still exceed subdivision standards for corner lots and <br />the expanded lot on Minnesota Avenue would be large enough to <br />construct a new home without variances and still be consistent <br />wit~ lot widths in the adjacent neighborhood. <br /> <br />3. The Planning Commission, on a 6-0 vote, recommend approval of <br />Sarah Cave's request for a division of a platted lot at 2271 <br />Western Avenue with the following condition: <br /> <br />a. That staff pay particular attention to drainage issues at <br />the time the building permit application is submitted. <br /> <br />Alternatives: <br /> <br />1. Deny the proposed lot division based on the finding that the <br />proposal is not consistent with the City's zoning ordinance and <br />subdivision regulations. <br /> <br />2. Approve the request based on the finding that the proposal <br />would be consistent wi th the ci ty , s zoning ordinance and <br />subdivision regulations and would not be detrimental to the <br />