|
<br />between the house and the free standing garage.
<br />
<br />Based on his belief that he could expand his home toward the
<br />lake, as long as he did not cross the vertical plane of the at
<br />grade deck closest to the lake, Mr. Kadrie began construction
<br />0t . th~ . kitchen addition. uj;ildi:h9""Iñspectd;on~
<br />sttit~~~~#~ff~~~~!~~~~i~ ,.', ...."... . ,"_ ."", .",g'.'''"i.''i''i'Vg;}W "'i"$. 'i' 'r"/"'f+."i:~:J.!t'1~i~¡~;:~~~iç;iiS~~~¡
<br />O'f.........i~a:m:rQ'i".g'Ð'tI¡,31'>$J¡¡dli1fr.tcg'Jki;,ip.&~~,.SW¡jfia.'Þttþ4;,ti.C!I)~ea;;¡~f1e'j'/i'setDacks··.··.·.·COUld;¡;w}je
<br />~~~~~~~~ (building permits are valid for one year).
<br />
<br />Staff's interpretation of the shoreline management ordinance
<br />would allow Mr. Kadrie to extend his kitchen only to the limits
<br />of the existing first floor deck. It is staff's feeling that
<br />extending a new deck beyond this point should be interpreted as
<br />increasing a substandard dimension and therefore, is prohibited
<br />by ordinance. Staff further interprets the code to limit
<br />further enroachment on the lower level beyond the existing
<br />structural wall (the at grade deck is not considered to be an
<br />integral structural element). Mr. Kadrie's view is that the
<br />limits of the lower at grade deck established that point beyond
<br />which substandard dimensions cannot be allowed. and is asking
<br />the council, as the Board of zoning Appeal, for an
<br />interpretation on this matter.
<br />
<br />policv Ob;ectives:
<br />
<br />5.
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />1. To protect the natural ecology and aesthetic environment of the
<br />community through the wise development of shore lands of public
<br />waters.
<br />
<br />S ta;fif;,.ií;Recommend'a:td:;on'~
<br />
<br /><!) It is recommended that the city Council, acting as the Board of
<br />._ c~. Zoning Appeals, interpret the provisions of the shoreland
<br />~'~~c~9 management ordinance such that Mr. Kadrie could expand his home
<br />51 \~:"~' <,,~:-,....\. ~-~\ to the 1 imi ts of the existing first floor deck but no further.
<br />',.;.( iF(" c..¡f5j \;\t'"':";>,'\'This would prohibit the extension of the deck around his . new
<br />'~~:"':::::\<~:(l,\i) µ"\~' addition. A building permit for this ~ddition needs to be
<br />'; ...J!v:;·'-:',t-lrPy)v applied for prior to any further work be~ng completed.
<br />,N·;'I. , . ;,n \., Q¡, "
<br />,...·ty ),
<br />¡,le,' \.»1' Council Action Requested:
<br />, "\i( \..~
<br />,-J ~ ~IÇ '\" ,.}. t.
<br />. (V .,,-
<br />tj" \ fl"\, v.a.·
<br />-,,1_,\"-- e(:
<br />, , ," 1 'f· .
<br />lU
<br />--t-'"
<br />
<br />Motion to interpret the prov~s~ons of the Roseville shoreland
<br />management ordinance in a manner to allow Mr. Kadrie to expand
<br />his home and above ground deck onl v to the 1 imi ts of the
<br />existing first floor deck subject to applying for the
<br />appropriate building permit·_.~r"
<br />
<br />.(~\ C~
<br />\~
<br />ff( ~XíP
<br />AtfJr , VV';'
<br />>(~ Y ,
<br />~
<br />
<br />staff Report by:
<br />
<br />Mike Falk
<br />
|