pf_02642 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

" þ And that part of the above West half which lies within a circular cul-de-sac 100 feet in diameter, the center of which is located on the Easterly boundary of said property distant 419.52 feet South of the North line ofthe west half Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of southwest quarter of said Section 12. Document No. 1716354: Except the North 30 feet, the West 25 feet of the following described property: the North half of the East two acres of the West half of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 12, Township 29, Range 23 West. WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council held a hearing regarding the roadway easement vacation on May 23,2994 and determined the roadway easement should be vacated; and, WHEREAS, the necessary approved roadway easement documents were not recorded within the required six month time line and became null and void; and, WHEREAS, Section 1013.04 of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance outlines the procedure for vacation of street or ally ways; and, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Roseville, Minnesota (the "City"), Ramsey County, Minnesota, that roadway easement documents number 2191187, 1579619 and 1716354 covering a portion of Cohansey Street between Lovell Avenue and Minnesota A venue, be vacated, subject to: A. Easements for public or private purposes, including, but not limited to, water lines, sewer mains, telephone lines and poles, gas and electric, and cable television lines, including the right to maintain the same or enter upon such land or portion thereof vacated, to maintain, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, existing on the date of this vacation, shall be preserved and maintained by said utility holder pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 160.29. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Mastel, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Mastel, Goedeke, Maschka, Wiski and Kysylyczyn and the following voted against the same: None WHEREUPON, said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.