CC_Minutes_2014_0609 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,June 9, 2014 Page 21 as a control issue, but simply to make things more transparent to the public, with the control obviously remaining at the City Council level, with the Park Board fo- cused on maintaining that essential service that was valued by all. Councilmember Laliberte stated that she didn't disagree with the transparency is- sue; but with previous engagement issues, she remained concerned that some de- cision-making would be made at the Park Board level with an empty room versus a more publicly perceived City Council meeting. Councilmember Laliberte ad- vised that she needed to make that connection even though she wasn't confident all the engagement and communication components had been addressed suffi- ciently. Specific to their research about a Park Board, Commissioner Doneen noted that they varied throughout the state, along with their duties which were established by the City Council, and asked that this be given consideration as well, if there were specific concerns or aspects that the City Council wanted to remain involved in. Commissioner Doneen noted that it wasn't a "one fits all" aspect for a Park Board, and the City Council could decide what was needed and which areas would be more of a focus of the Park Board or for the City Council. Councilmember McGehee expressed appreciation of the Commission's work and expressed understanding of the transparency issue; reiterating her support for a referendum on this and ultimate disappointment that it was not done. Coun- cilmember McGehee stated that she saw that as an important engagement tool to educate the public before they went to the polls, similar to the City Hall/Public Works Building referendum, with changes made to the original plan as part of that process, and openly discussed as part of the "People's City Hall." Councilmem- ber McGehee expressed her strong support of that process, but was unsure how to fit that into the operation of a Park Board. From her perspective with large ex- penditures of public funds, Councilmember McGehee opined that it was critical to have a referendum to engage citizens and their opportunity to weigh in later. Mayor Roe noted that a referendum was required and clearly outlined by state statute for bonding in some circumstances, and that was the determining factor, and referendums were not based on the amount of money proposed to be spent. Specific to establishment of a Park Board, Mayor Roe opined that it could solve things; but consideration of a community center was a specific project and there were ways available to solve funding issues without a Park Board. In conclusion, Mayor Roe suggested discussion continue at the next joint meeting, with the consensus of the City Council to schedule joint meetings quarterly. Recess Mayor Roe recessed the meeting at approximately 8:45 p.m. and reconvened at approximately 8:48 p.m.