Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 9, 2014 <br /> Page 24 <br /> ing the same ability to secure that more advantageous financing to lower their <br /> debt costs, the same concept as with public bond issues. <br /> Douglas Schroeder, Chief Financial Officer,University of Northwestern <br /> Mr. Schroeder briefly stated that the University currently had three tax exempt <br /> bond issues. In the process of securing financing for more bond projects, and <br /> with significant law changes anticipated in 2016 and 2017 (Dodd Frank laws) and <br /> significant refinancing costs forced on current letters of credit backing up those <br /> bonds, Mr. Schroeder stated that with the costs in financing this bond issue, it was <br /> thought to be in the best interest for the University to recombine and put the <br /> bonds in a different package. Mr. Schroeder advised that they anticipated $6 mil- <br /> lion in new financing for the current projects, including acquisition of the current <br /> County Inn and Suites and conversion of that facility into student housing, but re- <br /> financing their entire$25 million portfolio. <br /> As stated by Mr. Miller, Mr. Schroeder advised that tax exempt bonding is availa- <br /> ble to the University as a non-profit, and if they were not required to pay higher <br /> interest rates, they wouldn't need to raise tuition. Since the University, like most <br /> colleges, is facing declining enrollment, with staff and employee compensation <br /> adjustments only given twice over the last five years, Mr. Schroeder opined that <br /> the University thought this step allowed them to remain competitive and be good <br /> stewards. <br /> Mayor Roe opened the Public Hearing at approximately 8:10 p.m. for the purpose <br /> of acknowledging the expenditure of tax-exempt funds for the University of <br /> Northwestern— St. Paul. <br /> Public Comment <br /> Tim Callaghan,3062 Shorewood Lane <br /> Mr. Callaghan questioned why the City would agree to the continuing degradation <br /> of his neighborhood by allowing the proposed funding, when it had significant <br /> impacts on his property value. Mr. Callaghan opined that he would not be able to <br /> hold an open house in anticipation of selling his home if there was a game going <br /> on at the University due to noise levels. Mr. Callaghan opined that he could see <br /> no public purpose in this whole thing, and therefore, why do it; and further opined <br /> that the City needed to protect where it stood on public bonds and financing for <br /> the government to do its work, with this proposal removing $26 million from the <br /> government. <br /> Since he has found no recourse regarding this negative impact on his house, Mr. <br /> Callaghan stated that he may have to seek legal remedies; opining that Northwest- <br /> ern had been a bad neighbor for twenty-five years, and even though he continued <br /> to bring complaints forward, nothing was ever done about it. Mr. Callaghan stat- <br /> ed that the University was not someone he considered a good neighbor, and he <br /> didn't want them as one. Mr. Callaghan spoke in further opposition to taking the <br /> County Inn off the tax rolls, even though when that facility was built with Tax In- <br />