My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0609
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0609
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2014 10:26:48 AM
Creation date
6/25/2014 10:21:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/9/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 9,2014 <br /> Page 30 <br /> Roe suggested tabling any changes to Table 1005-1 in the "Residential-Family <br /> Living" use category. Mayor Roe stated that, to a certain degree, he needed to <br /> understand staffs rationale better, and why they didn't recommend changing it to <br /> conditional for attached single-family or multi-family in those areas, with others <br /> changed from permitted to not permitted. <br /> Mr. Paschke advised that most smaller corner nodes are Neighborhood Business <br /> designation for small or medium parcels, with the rationale that some smaller pro- <br /> jects or uses (e.g. row homes or town homes) may be suitable for those areas. If <br /> the designation was CU, it allowed a determination on whether or not they were <br /> appropriate. As it relates to changing more apartments uses to permitted in com- <br /> mercial districts, Mr. Paschke advised that staff saw no difference in that than in <br /> mixed use development, allowing housing as a part of the redevelopment with <br /> commercial uses on the lower level and rentals above, which was a goal of the <br /> Comprehensive Plan. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested that part of the discussion be deferred as well, since it was <br /> unrelated to tonight's discussion; with consensus of the body to delay considera- <br /> tion of changes to the Multi-family use category at this time. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Laliberte, Mayor Roe clarified that, in deter- <br /> mining conditional or permitted uses, he considered the adjacent use: if single- <br /> family, to look at conditional use, and if in a commercial area not having the same <br /> level of concern, he could support permitted use status; however, he advised that <br /> he didn't have a strong point of view on the matter, and would consider condi- <br /> tional use across the board. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Etten related to student housing standards (line <br /> 140, c), Mr. Paschke duly noted the maximum height of 45' in this section, while <br /> the remainder of code says 40 feet for review and consistency throughout code. <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, Mr. Schroeder responded to related questions: <br /> Number of students per unit and overall <br /> Mr. Schroder advised that they anticipate 190 students overall, approximately two <br /> per room, with more students in suites, probably 3-4 students; but mostly two stu- <br /> dents for each standard hotel room. <br /> Sprinkler/ADA compliance <br /> Mr. Schroeder advised that the County Inn & Suites building was fully sprin- <br /> klered and handicapped accessible. <br /> Parking <br /> In leadership meetings at the University, Mr. Schroeder noted that parking was <br /> always an issue for a campus community. Mr. Schroeder advised that the Univer- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.