Laserfiche WebLink
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br /> CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City <br /> of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 23`d day of June 2014 at 6:00 p.m. <br /> The following Members were present: Laliberte, McGehee, Willmus, Etten, Roe <br /> and no members were absent. <br /> Council Member McGehee introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 11161 <br /> A RESOLUTION DENYING THE PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT OF OAK ACRES <br /> (PF07-039) <br /> WHEREAS, Arthur Mueller, applicant for approval of the proposed plat, owns the <br /> residential property at 2201 Acorn Road, which is legally described as; <br /> PIN: 08-29-23-44-0016 <br /> That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 29, <br /> Range 23, according to government survey, described as follows (all bearings in this <br /> description being based on the South line of said Southeast Quarter as an East and West <br /> line): <br /> Commencing at a point 33 feet North of the South line and 1221.63 feet West of the East <br /> line of said Section 8; thence North 0 degrees 08 minutes West 295 feet to the point of <br /> beginning of the tract being described; thence East 290.64 feet; thence North 4 degrees 41 <br /> minutes East 81.70 feet; thence North 14 degrees 23 minutes 30 seconds East 184.29 feet; <br /> thence North 5 degrees 51 minutes 30 seconds West 14.61 feet; thence West 339.77 feet; <br /> thence South 0 degrees 08 minutes East 265 feet to point of beginning, Ramsey County, <br /> Minnesota. <br /> WHEREAS, the applicant has sought approval of the Oak Acres preliminary plat, herein <br /> referred to as the "project"; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council, at its regular meeting on June 23, 2014 reviewed <br /> the project, the pertinent zoning and subdivision regulations, and the public record, received <br /> additional comments from the applicant and members of the public in attendance, and made the <br /> following findings of fact: <br /> 1) The project's proposed storm water retention/infiltration areas, known as best <br /> management practices ("BMPs"), do not provide sufficient assurance that they will <br /> adequately prevent standing-water ("ponding") conditions. <br /> Page 1 of 3 <br />