res_11161 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

2) The project's plans do not provide sufficient protection against standing-water conditions in the event the BMPs fail. 3) The project's proposed infiltration basins on roughly the southern half of the subject property do not provide for overflow drainage into a body of water or the City's storm water sewer system. This is problematic given the existing surrounding, low-infiltration soil conditions where these basins overflow because there is insufficient off-site storm sewer or other conveyance system to provide adequate flow away from neighboring parcels. 4) The project's proposed grading design does not provide adequate assurance that trees intended to remain on the property, in accordance with the City's tree preservation policy, will survive in the long-term due to their close proximity to said grading. 5) The project's proposed number of new building sites and proposed quantity of removed trees is inconsistent with the goals contained within the City's comprehensive plan relative to maintaining neighborhood identities and character. 6) The project's plans do not provide for adequate parking considerations, given the quadrupling of home sites on the property with less-than-standard street width and cul-de-sac radius, which would preclude on-street parking, and given the inability for convenient overflow parking on Acorn Road, where parking is also prohibited due to its less-than-standard width. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, that the proposed preliminary plat is hereby denied. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Willmus and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: McGehee, Willmus, Etten; and Laliberte and Roe voted against. WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 2 of 3