Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />,I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Jf <br /> <br />Churches with adequate acoustics are all very tall spaces -- as required to allow longer <br />reverberation times to support choral and organ music, and congregational singing. For <br />churches with a seating capacity of 800 or more seats, the ceiling heights are frequently as <br />high as 90 ft. They are rarely less than 60 ft. RLC's proposed Worship Center is not a <br />concert hall. But as a comparison, most successful concert halls in the world have ceiling <br />heights in the neighborhood of 60 ft. In addition, typically there is a minimum of 10 ft <br />required above the ceiling for ductwork, structure, and roof construction, which increases the <br />outside height of those buildings accordingly. <br /> <br />We analyzed how RLC needed to use this building and the fixed wall dimensions HGA <br />specified after working out the seating. We initially concluded that the Worship Center <br />required a volume calling for a ceiling height of 62 feet, on top of the proposed basement, for <br />adequate acoustics. To address that height, RLC's design team eliminated the basement and <br />lowered the main floor to the level of the baseball field, which reduced the overall height by <br />one full story. The design team further requested that AD develop approaches to meet RLC I S <br />acoustic requirements with a lower roof. <br /> <br />As a result of that process, we have developed a unique acoustical design for the Worship <br />Center, which now allows a longer reverberation time to be developed with less volume (in <br />other words a lower ceiling height) than normal. In our design, there is a second ceiling <br />surface in the room considerably below the building ceiling to partially decouple the volume <br />above it from the volume below it. The space above behaves as a partially coupled <br />reverberation chamber, and feeds lower level reverberation back down into the seating area, <br />creating a longer reverberation time than is possible in a standard room design. In other <br />words, this unique acoustical design allowed us to reduce the proposed ceiling height of the <br />building 9 feet -- from 62 feet down to 53 feet. <br /> <br />By adding movable sound absorbing or reflecting materials throughout the Worship Center, <br />this design provides the additional benefit of allowing musicians to tI tune " , or adjust the <br />acoustical properties of the Worship Center. In addition to the styles of music represented by <br />religious pipe organ, choir, congregational singing and orchestral accompaniment, the <br />combination of a partially decoupled volume and movable acoustically absorbing materials <br />extends the range of acoustical conditions to encompass requirements for the spoken word and <br />amplified instrumentation. That by-product of this design addresses the Church's critical <br />ministry and worship requirement for a building which will also accommodate 'laltemate" <br />worship liturgy demanded by members and guests, such as gospel, jazz, and Christian rock <br />music styles. This flexibility should also make it an attractive venue for a wide range of <br />secular community events. <br /> <br />The initial design height was reduced one story by removing the basement, and an additional <br />nine feet through innovative acoustical design. Even with this uniquely efficient design, the <br />nominal building height is about 10 ft above the RM 1 zoning height specification. I understand <br />from HGA that matching the existing two building levels requires that the building walls be a <br />minimum of 25 feet above the baseball field grade. To fit within the 30 foot R-1 height <br />specification, the roof could not extend more than ten additional feet up. Our professional <br />opinion, which can be confirmed by listening in other similar facilities, is that reducing the <br />interior volume to that level would result in severely degraded acoustics for musical worship <br />expression. Compared to proper acoustics, the sound would be lacking in excitement, harsh <br />and unresponsive. In our experience, the degradation in acoustical performance would be <br />clearly noticeable and irritating to most listeners. The acoustics will almost certainly be a <br />great source of frustration to the musicians, creating almost impossible conditions for them. <br /> <br />Roseville Lutheran Church <br /> <br />- 2 - <br /> <br />October 21, 1994 <br />