Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />,I <br />I <br />I' <br />'I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I. <br />,I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />ROSEVlLLE LUTHERAN CHURCH <br />Summary of Site Plan Alternatives <br /> <br />Roseville Lutheran Church ran out of space to continue its ministry seven years ago. In 1987 <br />RLC hired a church planning and architectural company to evaluate alternatives for providing the <br />physical space and tools RLC's growth demanded. Because RLC had no land for more buildings <br />or parking, however, expansion proved impossible. Thus, RLC worked from 1987 through 1983 <br />to evaluate options and reach a resolution to its land shortage crisis. <br /> <br />This section summarizes the major illustrations RLC's consultants created as aids to investigating <br />the proper location, orientation and height for the Proposed Worship Center. The illustrations <br />project a completed campus, although RLC has always anticipated construction over multiple <br />phases and several decades. The choices RLC made were communal assessments made by <br />dozens of individuals. Only the primary factors influencing the outcomes are summarized here. <br /> <br />Selecting the location of the Worship Center on the property required RLC to optimize five <br />factors: <br /> <br />1. Balancing the distance and visual impact among Fernwood Avenue, Ryan Avenue <br />and Roselawn Avenue; <br /> <br />2. Maximizing the efficiency of future off-street parking, to leave the most Green <br />Space adjacent to Bruce Russell Park, and to defer relocation of the Park tennis courts for shared <br />use parking; <br /> <br />3. Providing efficient pedestrian traffic flow within the existing facilities, and providing <br />grounds and connections for future additional facilities; <br /> <br />4. Meeting the requirements set forth in RLC's Space Program, which forecast future <br />meeting, administration, education and worship space and parking requirements, including <br />keeping 100% of the space in the existing facilities useable at least into the next decade; <br /> <br />5. Cost effectiveness. <br /> <br />CONCLUSION <br /> <br />Two independent architectural firms have recommended the proposed Worship Center location. <br />Two separate RLC planning committees, and literally hundreds of Roseville residents, both RLC <br />members and neighbors, have also reviewed the location question. The City's professional staff <br />has reviewed the location of the Worship Center on the site throughout numerous reviews. Of <br />the possibilities that do not require RLC to tear down its existing structures, the nearly unanimous <br />preference for the Worship Center location has been the center of RLC's site. That preference is <br />reflected in the proposed site plan. <br /> <br />-9- <br />