My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02708
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2700
>
pf_02708
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:05:40 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 12:37:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2708
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
1215 ROSELAWN AVE
Applicant
ROSEVILLE LUTHERAN CHURCH
Status
APPROVED
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Hammel. Green (, Abrahamson Design. <br /> <br />When RlC retained Hammel Green & Abrahamson, Architects, in 1992, the second RLC <br />committee and the new architects started over, to determine the best building location. Because <br />that process independently came to the same conclusion reached in 1989, this summary does <br />not rehash the same rationale employed. Hammel Green 5- Abrahamson Exhibits A through J <br />were used as discussion tools in formulating and refining a Master Space Ministry Plan for this <br />congregation. HQA also prepared an array of subsidiary drawings illustrating variations or details. <br /> <br />Exhibit A. This diagram uses the hexagonal Worship Center design presented in June <br />1993, adding two extensions to house choir, organ, chancel and sacristy. The square shape in <br />the current proposal evolved from RLC's realization that the Worship Center needed that extra <br />space in the corners for support functions. This Master Plan alternative included a future "great <br />haIr' in the northeast. The Church determined that it did not need both the 1969 Activity Center <br />and a second "great hall,lt and that it could not afford to destroy its lounge. The design was not <br />pursued further. This design continued the architectural objective of creating a straight line <br />between the new Worship Centert the new Gathering Area, and the 1969 Activity Center. Both <br />the Gathering Area and the new Worship Center were planned to have a fu)] basement level <br />beneath them, resulting in a very tall structure. <br /> <br />i <br />-..-..j <br /> <br />-..........., <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />j <br />! <br /> <br />_.._..1 <br /> <br />-"-""] <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />L.._. ._.._.._.._.._.._.._.. -,. ----"-'-" -,,-"-" -..-..----..-.. -..-'. -' <br /> <br /> <br />i <br />I i <br />! <br />! <br />! <br />i <br />i <br />! <br />i <br />i <br />! <br />! <br />I <br />! <br /> <br />)1 <br />! <br />I <br />i <br />j <br />! ... <br />j <br />i <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.