My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02708
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2700
>
pf_02708
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:05:40 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 12:37:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2708
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
1215 ROSELAWN AVE
Applicant
ROSEVILLE LUTHERAN CHURCH
Status
APPROVED
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />November 3 Meeting With the Adjacent Roselawn Avenue Neighbors. <br /> <br />RLC invited the seven southern homeowners on Roselawn directly across from the site to discuss <br />landscaping and related matters. Five of the owners joined us. <br /> <br />The strong concensus of those homeowners was that they wanted to be able to see the Worship <br />Center and the parking area from their homes. They rejected a dense pattern of tree screening, <br />either at the Roselawn boulevard or at the base of the Worship Center. They reported that they <br />would not appreciate berms, fences, or a continuous line of dense shrub plantings along the <br />boulevard. The veiled screening of deciduous trees along the Roselawn boulevard was preferrable <br />year round to dense evergreens. <br /> <br />These neighbors asked RLC to consider retaining the existing over-story trees as detailed in Exhibit <br />B. They asked that the current variety of tree species along Roselawn be continued. They preferred <br />intermixing lower height shrubs along the parking lot. They felt that smaller, less dense trees, such <br />as ornamentals, were preferrable at the parking lot islands to taller, more dense trees. They asked <br />that the church parking lot entrance sight lines be kept relatively clear for driving. They asked that <br />parking lot lighting not be obscured by over~size trees. <br /> <br />The only discernable disagreement among these neighbors was that some asked that RLC cut <br />down the large cottonwood, and others were equally hopeful that RLC would save it. Saving the <br />cottonwood won out. <br /> <br />In response to this input, RLC prepared the following Exhibit C concept landscape plan. In this plan <br />more of the berming has been removed and intermittent shrub plantings provide a headlight <br />barrier. The eight parking lot island trees are slightly smaller and less opaque. Recommended <br />colorful, hardy, native shrub types on this plan include: <br /> <br />Dwarf Red Twig Dogwood <br />Compact Viburnums <br /> <br />Sea Green Evergreens <br /> <br />Recommended tree types for the islands on this plan include: <br /> <br />Crab Apple <br />Japanese Tree Ulac <br /> <br />Canada Red Cheny <br />simUar varieties <br /> <br />Recommended tree types for the Roselawn and Fernwood boulevards include: <br /> <br />Maple <br />Locust <br /> <br />Ash <br />Unden <br /> <br />Boulevard trees will not be planted until Spring 1996. RLC hopes to defer final specification of <br />boulevard trees until the City enacts boulevard tree regulations sometime in 1995, so that RLC can <br />take advantage of the City's commissioned boulevard tree study. <br /> <br />-)6- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.