Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4 " <br /> <br />Steve Sarkozy, City Manager <br />City of Roseville <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Hoseville, Minnesota 55113 <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />, <br />~ <br /> <br />Vecember 29, 1994 <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Dear Sirl <br /> <br />I am, with this letter. issuing a formal complaint regarding the <br />granting of an approximate 11 foot variance in the construction <br />of a home at 1960 North Dale St., Roseville, Mn. 55113. <br /> <br />Evidently, formal meetings have been held regarding not only the <br />issuance of a building permit, but also of a variance which <br />allowed this home to be constructed closer to my property line <br />than current law permits. I was never informed of any such <br />meetin~s or granting of variances although this home directly <br />abuts my property. <br /> <br />Shortly after surveyor's flags appeared, I went to the City Hall <br />requestin~ information regarding this property at 1960 North Dale <br />and inquiring as to construction plans for this property. I was <br />informed that no information refarding this property at 1960 North <br />Lale had been inputted into the computer system. This means to <br />me that at that point no formal plans had been approved or dis- <br />approved. ~ithin 10 days of this visit, clearing of the property <br />by heavy equipment had begun on 11/17/94. I assumed that the <br />building construction would proceed in code since I knew nothing <br />of the granting of any variances. Only after contacting Mike in <br />Roseville Planning and asking why the house foundation appeared <br />so close to my property line, did I learn from Mike that a <br />variance had been granted. He statea that current law requires. <br />that the rear of the buildin~ be 30 feet from the property line. <br />This home is approximately 19 feet from my property line. <br /> <br />To any objective observer, it is clear that the current location <br />of this home significantly reduces the value of my property, and <br />limits the options I may have for its use in the future. <br /> <br />Since Hoseville was negligent in granting this variance to the <br />property at 1960 North Lale, and showed no concern whatsoever to <br />its impact on the adjoininr. property most effected, I am <br />requesting the following actionl <br /> <br />1. No further variances will be granted to the property at <br />1960 North Dale regarding construction at the rear of the <br />home, such as decks, sheds, or attached protuberances, <br />other than steps and a narrow sidewalk heaaing south <br />to the driveway. <br />