My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014_0714_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2014
>
2014_0714_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2014 3:59:32 PM
Creation date
7/10/2014 12:46:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 1005-1 NB CB RB-1 RB-z CMU Standards <br />mixed-use building) <br />Dwelling, multi-family (8 or more units <br />C #R P �1-R P �1-R P P <br />per building) — <br />Dwelling unit, accessory NP NP NP NP � NP Y <br />Live-work unit C NP NP NP P Y <br />Residential—Group Living <br />Community residential facility, state <br />C NP NP NP C Y <br />licensed, serving 7-16 persons <br />Student housing NP P P P NP y <br />Nursing home, assisted living facility C C C C C Y <br />Civic and Institutional Uses <br />College or post-secondary school, <br />NP NP P P � NP Y <br />campus <br />College or post-secondary school, office- <br />P P P P P Y <br />based <br />Community center, library, municipal <br />NP NP P P P <br />building <br />Place of assembly P P P P P Y <br />School, elementary or secondary NP NP P P � NP Y <br />Theater, performing arts center NP NP P P P Y <br />(Ord. 1427, 7-9-2012; Ord. 1445, 7-8-2013; Ord. 1446, 7-8-2013; Ord. 1447, 7-8-2013; Ord. 1451, 8-12-2013) <br />�.: STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />3� Based on the comments provided above in this report, the Planning Division recommends <br />4-���� approval of the proposed TExT AMEIVnMENTS to Table 1005-1 of the Zoning Ordinance. <br />4° PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br />4G At their meeting of May 5, 2014, the Planning Commission held the duly noticed public hearing <br />4� regarding the text amendment request. No citizens addressed the Commission, but <br />4 n Commissioners did want to better understanding on why "college or post-secondary school, <br />45 campus" in the CMU district was being changed from permitted to not permitted. The City and <br />4� Senior Planner's provided responses to commissioners regarding these items (see Attachment <br />4� A). <br />4� The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the proposed text amendments, <br />4�� with the Planning staff to review and possibly modify the definition of student housing. <br />50 <br />RCA_TextAmdts 071414.doc <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.